Saturday, March 28, 2009

Must See - Sixth sense demo

This is definitely a must see and I already see elements of this today with the various context (maps & search) services coming live around us.

Friday, March 27, 2009

Android up, down, then up again (maybe)

The mobile OS space hasn't ever been hotter ! Reminds me of the eternal and very public Boeing and Airbus battle...this time though it seem to be between the Android and Symbian with both vying for the "Open(ness)" crown

Android up, down, then up again (maybe)

26/03/2009 - by TelecomTV One

What a difference a month makes. Way back in February Android, the Google-inspired open smartphone platform, was apparently on a downer and even, it was whispered, somewhat of a spend force. But now, reports of its death seem highly exaggerated, says Ian Scales.

When none of the mooted Android handsets rumoured for launch actually showed up at MWC in Barcelona, things looked bad for the platform.

True, there was the announcement by Vodafone that it was going to carry the next HTC Android, but somehow that wasn't enough. Despondency was palpable in the Android camp.

However, over the last couple of weeks the news-flow seems to show Android still in rude health. Applications continue to arrive on the Android Market, such as the recent announcement of the mobilemulti-IM app Palringo (it enables you to ping most of the other IM platforms from a single app).

More news of vendor support too. Acer announced that it will launch a device in September - the A1 will be one of four Android-based offerings from the world's third-largest PC vendor.

Samsung has announced that its first Android phone will be be released no earlier than the third quarter of 2009 and it expects to be the first of the five largest suppliers of mobile phones to get to market with Android.

Most recently, Orange France is reported to planning a veritable Android assault with plans to add Android devices from Sony Ericsson, Motorola and Samsung.
Click here to find out more!

According to unconfirmed reports, Orange is enthusiastic about Android unit pricing (apparently cheaper than equivalent smartphones) and is also happy to take the revenue share assigned to carriers from the Android Market.

Maybe an open smartphone platform is a little (just a little, mind you) like a terrorist organisation, in that it only has to get through once or twice with iconic or highly popular handsets to have a market-dominating effect, whereas a closed OS like iPhone, requires its producer to be successful every time.

Whatever the reason, researchers Informa expect Android to outstrip the iPhone by 2012, based mostly on the calculation that all other things being fairly equal, an open platform with a plethora of producers and outlets is likely to better in market share terms than a single, proprietary system.

Informa also thinks Symbian will do better once it's new openness results in new software and it expects it to maintain its OS leadership in the medium term.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Microsoft to Tackle Google Street View With Crowd-Sourced App

Its Microsoft now which is making moves in the context space with a crowd sourced street view akin offering. We've been expecting moves from them in the context space now for some time the direction in which the industry is gravitating and given their underlying existing assets.

Whats interesting though is that in the last few months, crowd sourced data with light moderation seems more acceptable now.

Microsoft to Tackle Google Street View With Crowd-Sourced App

BY Kit EatonMon Mar 23, 2009 at 11:07 am

Google's Street View app, alongside Google Earth, has ever-so-slightly changed the world--buying a house may never be the same again, for one thing, nor will smartphone-based navigation. And that's probably why another tech giant wants in on the same action. Microsoft's apparently due to have a go with its own application dubbed GeoSynth.


But unlike Google's imagery which is sourced by a fleet of sensor-equipped cars with 360ยบ-view cameras and laser range-finders driving the highways and byways of the world, Microsoft is going to find its images from someone else, namely, you. Essentially GeoSynth is going to function as a mashup between Microsoft's Virtual Earth maps system and its PhotoSynth technology.

PhotoSynth, if you haven't seen it, is a pretty remarkable piece of tech that rolled out of Microsoft's Live Labs run by Gary Flake. By performing some clever math equations, it can take crowd-sourced images of famous landmarks, and create pretty seamless 3D-walkaround footage by morphing and transforming the images successively as the viewer's virtual viewpoint translates around. Check it out in the video--it's undeniably impressive.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p16frKJLVi0&feature=player_embedded

And Microsoft thinks the system is now ready for a bigger project, namely GeoSynth--a virtualized, crowd-sourced, image-driven world map. The service will take the images and metadata from geotagged imagery supplied by the public to a special database and form them into Streetview-like world view application. Microsoft Virtual Earth expert Johannes Kebeck explained that the system will apparently be moderated somehow, so the "system would take the best images from a location to create a single image of a specific landmark," when talking to PocketLint.co.uk. If the scheme takes off and generates enough crowd-sourced images, it'll eventually be possible to view pretty much anywhere on the planet.

The third leg of the new app technology will apparently be Microsoft's Silverlight, the company's imagery/video accelerator browser plugin. Apparently it's due to be incorporated into Street View this summer and will speed up the system by eight times for users using IE8 as a browser (and five times for Google Chrome users.)

GeoSynth sounds clever, and it's certainly a much more cost-effective way of sourcing the images than having a fleet of specialized cars drive across the planet. Plus, where there are sites of specific interest, such as a famous landmark, the PhotoSynth aspect should allow you to view even more detailed imagery than is possible from Google's system. GeoSynth hasn't officially been announced, but it's reportedly due to arrive "later in the year."

Sunday, March 22, 2009

Does location-based networking need some direction?

The entrance of two huge tech players into the space--Google's Latitude and Yahoo's Fire Eagle--has given location-based networking some validation.

It's also possible that one of them will be the company to come up with the standard that will help level the playing field and allow different services to coexist much like cell carriers in the text-messaging space. Or, perhaps location-based networking will better mirror microblogging: a few years ago, there were several competing services like Pownce and Jaiku in addition to Twitter that are now either defunct or effectively afterthoughts.

Does location-based networking need some direction?

AUSTIN, Texas--There's Loopt, Brightkite, Whrrl, FourSquare, Rummble, uLocate, Google Latitude, Yahoo Fire Eagle, and goodness knows which other ones we haven't heard of yet. The location-based mobile networking space has been front and center at this year's South by Southwest Interactive Festival as hundreds of tech enthusiasts from around the country have been eager to find their friends and learn what's happening.

Perhaps it's fitting that in one of the festival's last panels on Tuesday afternoon, a handful of executives and high-level developers from the location-awareness space got together for a discussion called "Using GPS and Location to Enhance Social Networking." The big question: Do all these disparate services have to get interoperable?

Moderator Tom Marchioro, the location-based services architect at GPS navigation company Garmin, brought up an analogy to text messaging and Web-based IM, two early social-media technolgoies that took very different routes.

After years of carrier restriction, text messages "came up with a standard, and last year there were 1.9 trillion text messages sent worldwide, and it's a total cash cow," Marchioro said. "Internet messaging, 10 to 15 years after it was invented...is a bunch of independent networks and there's no monetization model. So that would argue that if we're going to have a bunch of location-based social networks, they might want to interoperate."

One panelist, Bryan Jones of Mobile Blast, brought up the OSLO Accord, a project raised at this year's Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, which hopes to bring an OpenID-like standard to location sharing.

Not all the panelists seemed to be on board.

"We would love to be able to work with the other social networks out there, (but) some of the challenge with that is that your social graphs tend to be very different across different social networks," said Martin May, founder of Brightkite.

John Adams, from Twitter's operations team and who hinted that the microblogging service "hopes to have more services that are location-based in the future," said that it could be technically difficult as well. "Different services have different methods for identifying, storing, and locating different privacy data," he said. "With Brightkite, they have a much higher level of granularity around your location data...and it's very different to translate that between both systems."

There's really not a clear answer. And the entrance of two huge tech players into the space--Google's Latitude and Yahoo's Fire Eagle--has given location-based networking some validation. It's also possible that one of them will be the company to come up with the standard that will help level the playing field and allow different services to coexist much like cell carriers in the text-messaging space. Or, perhaps location-based networking will better mirror microblogging: a few years ago, there were several competing services like Pownce and Jaiku in addition to Twitter that are now either defunct or effectively afterthoughts.

One more thing on a slightly unrelated note: Adams did touch upon the "How is Twitter going to make money?" question. "We are looking at commercial accounts. We see a lot of potential in adding that service that (lets) you know you're talking to Shaq or that you know you're talking to a certain celebrity, and to weed out impersonation," he said, "without imposing fees on existing free services."


iPhone 3.0

Definitely raising the bar further. Some of the real interesting additions are in-app purchase and

iPhone 3.0

A quick grab of some of the key iPhone 3.0 features recently announced by Apple -
  • MMS
  • Copy, cut & paste text
  • Landscape keyboard in mail, notes, sms and other apps
  • Search in contacts, mail and calendar
  • Spotlight home screen (single location search)
  • Bluetooth headphone and P2P support
  • Voice memo
  • Live streaming of audio and video
  • HDTV streaming
Additions to SDK :
  • Maps application API - For embedding Google Maps into apps
  • P2P connectivity over bluetooth
  • Support for emdical devices pairing
  • Support for Push notifications for alerts
  • Support for in-app purchase
  • CalDAV calendar (enables third parties supporting mobile calendar features, iCalendar RSS feeds)
App Store Update
  • In-app purchases – Would allow for subscriptions, additional game levels and new content
  • 25k apps currently available
  • 800 Mn apps sold

Yahoo counters Google Latitude: Friends on Fire (Facebook App)

Social location just got hotter !! Geo-location is quickly gaining ground, but until it reaches critical mass the odds of randomly running into a friend for an impromptu get together are so low I doubt many people will take the time to manually update their location as in case of Friends on Fire (and thats why mobile based versions which tap into the phone's positioning technology - network, Wifi or GPS based have a substantial edge and are going to gain traction).

Fire Eagle is an intermediary. It relies on other services to tell it where you are and on other services to do something useful with that location data; only services you specifically authorize may do anything at all with Fire Eagle.

Yahoo counters Google Latitude: Friends on Fire

by Stephen Shankland, Webware, March 13, 2009

Taking a different approach to Google's Latitude software, Yahoo has released a Facebook application called Friends on Fire that lets people share their location with each other.

Google Latitude is an island unto itself, using Google's own technology for cell phone-based location detection and for managing who gets access to your location. Friends on Fire, though, stitches together a variety of services: Yahoo's Fire Eagle, a service that can store and share your location with authorized applications, and Facebook, which handles the issue of identifying who your friends are and granting them permission to see your location.

The service is intriguing, though as with any service that has to tiptoe carefully around a lot of privacy landmines, it can be somewhat burdensome to set up. It's great that Yahoo is making something real out of its Fire Eagle service, which previously was more about plumbing than a faucet.

Fire Eagle is an intermediary. It relies on other services to tell it where you are and on other services to do something useful with that location data; only services you specifically authorize may do anything at all with Fire Eagle.

"There are services that are more immediate than Fire Eagle, but as we get more apps, the value of updating once and having it shared across all your services is more important," said Fire Eagle leader Tom Coates in an interview just before he headed to the SXSW conference to announce the new technology.

Friends on Fire can be used to set and show your location and share it with friends.

Friends on Fire can be used to set and show your location and share it with friends.

At the same time Yahoo is releasing Friends on Fire to consume Fire Eagle location data, it's also releasing a Firefox plug-in to update Fire Eagle with your location through the browser. The plug-in, which uses Firefox's Geode plug-in to actually determine your location based on nearby wireless networks and other data, adds a toolbar button that lets you tell Fire Eagle where you are. You have to specifically enable Fire Eagle to accept data from the plug-in, just as you have to authorize Fire Eagle to share data with Friends on Fire.

Mobile Friends on Fire?

One big advantage Google Latitude has over Friends on Fire is that it works on mobile phones. For what seems to be everybody's favorite example of such services--meeting your friends at the bar--it's hardly convenient to lug around a laptop and hope you can find a wireless network to use Friends on Fire.

Coates said Yahoo is working on a mobile version, though.

"We are interested in a mobile site, though we aren't launching any mobile aspect," he said. "We are looking into mobile stuff for Friends on Fire."

The Web-based application uses advanced JavaScript technology such as Ajax, so at least theoretically, it should be able to run on an advanced mobile device's Web browser at some point.

Privacy concerns?

Google Latitude raised hackles among those worried the company already knows too much about people or that it might enable covert tracking. Friends on Fire has similar issues, but as with Google, Yahoo is trying to be overt about what's shared.

When you activate the application, you first have to authorize Fire Eagle to share data with it. Next, you can set what level of detail you want to share--nothing, exact location, neighborhood, zip code, city, county, state, or country. It also lets you enable Friends on Fire to set your location.

Next, the Facebook application shows a list of your Facebook friends who already have Friends on Fire installed. Clicking each one turns their icon green to enable sharing.

I found the application workable but imperfect. It was hard to say whether the fault lay with Facebook, Fire Eagle, or something else, but there seemed to be long waiting periods sometimes before information that should have been available actually arrived. One friend of mine in the Boston area appeared at first to be somewhere on a fishing boat off the coast of Gloucester, but I think that was an artifact of him not sharing his precise location.

Also, I didn't care for the signals feature of Friends on Fire, which lets you drop a note on the map--"here's where we're meeting," for example. It sounds useful in theory, but I couldn't figure a way to respond to another person's signal. It would have been a good place to spawn a conversation, but the closest I could come to that was sending a message through Facebook to the person who wrote the signal.

Overall, though, location is important. There are many occasions in life where we have to know where our friends, co-workers, and relations actually are. It remains to be seen if online services will surmount the privacy challenges, but at least the work has begun.


Yahoo’s Fire Eagle Soars Onto Facebook, Firefox
by Jason Kincaid, TechCrunch
March 13, 2009

This morning Yahoo has released a pair of new applications that tap into Fire Eagle, Yahoo’s ambitious geo-location system that allows a wide variety of web services to share your location data (after being granted permission to do so). The new applications include a rich Facebook application called Friends on Fire and a Fire Eagle extension for Firefox that allows users to update their location directly from their browser without having to leave the site they’re viewing.

Of the two, Friends on Fire for Facebook is the more consumer-friendly. The application allows you to pinpoint your current location on a map, as well as view the location of your friends (shared either through the Facebook app or any of the other 70+ supported Fire Eagle services). You can also append notes to any point on the map regardless of your current location (for example, I could tag my favorite restaurants in San Francisco, or point out a park where my friends should meet up later). The bottom of the app offers a listing of your friends’ recent locations and notes, and the app can also optionally syndicate your actions to Facebook’s news feeds.

The Firefox extension works as advertised, offering a handy button at the bottom right corner of your browser that can be used to update your location. Unfortunately, getting it installed is a bit of hassle. Because it is an ‘experimental’ extension, you’ll need to first register with Mozilla. Then you’ll have to enter your Yahoo ID. If you don’t have Mozilla’s Geode location-services extension installed, you’ll need to grab that too. Given all of these hoops, I think the only people who are going to install this extension for now are the people that really want it. But once you’re set up, it works like a charm.

On the development side of things, Fire Eagle has also rolled out a number of new features. The service now supports a new ActionScript library that makes the service more accessible to Flash developers. Fire Eagle has also implemented support for XMPP (used by many instant messaging systems) to offer real-time updating. Finally, the service will soon be able to associate location coordinates with nearby restaurants and locations.

Fire Eagle continues to innovate, but it still faces some challenges, the largest of which is that most people probably don’t have too many friends who are using it quite yet. Geo-location is quickly gaining ground, but until it reaches critical mass the odds of randomly running into a friend for an impromptu get together are so low I doubt many people will take the time to manually update their location. And the fact that some these services are also segmenting their audiences (Google’s new Latitude service doesn’t play nice with Fire Eagle) isn’t helping.

get widgetminimize
Fire Eagle image
Company: Yahoo!
Website: fireeagle.yahoo.net
Launch Date: March 5, 2008

Fire Eagle, a Yahoo Brickhouse project, isa location-sharing service. It launched privately on March 5, 2008 with very few user-facing features—allowing users to manually update their location—and a range of APIs allowing app developers to… Learn More

MWC09: New Yahoo Mobile With Integrated Opera Mini!

Sorry about the delayed post but definitely one of the stars of the Mobile World Congress 2009 for me. The integration of an individuals social graph (email, phonebook and social networking) was truly impressive.

MWC09: New Yahoo Mobile With Integrated Opera Mini!

Yahoo Mobile App

Wow, Yahoo announced a new mobile platform that looks very exciting indeed. The new Yahoo Mobile will be a available as mobile web site and as an app for the iPhone, Nokia S60, S40 BlackBerry and selected Samsung, Sony Ericsson and Motorola devices. The mobile web and iPhone versions include the usual Yahoo Mobile features like news, oneSearch, Yahoo IM and Calendar. But there's a lot more including direct access to social networks Bebo, Dopplr, Facebook, Flickr, Friendster Last.fm, MySpace, Twitter and YouTube and to Gmail, Hotmail and AOL Mail. Users will be able to customize the portal with personalized weather reports, stock quotes, sports scores and horoscopes and add other content including RSS feeds and external links.

The Yahoo Mobile application (image left or above) will include all of the mobile web features plus maps, widgets, voice enabled search and an integrated version of Opera Mini 4.2!

It sounds like a complete revamping of Yahoo's mobile services with some very interesting and remarkably open features.

Yahoo Mobile will begin with a managed Beta of the mobile web and iPhone versions starting late next month.

The mobile web version will support phones running WebKit-based browsers (e.g. iPhone and iPod touch, many Nokia Series 60 and Android devices), Opera Mini 4.x, Windows Mobile devices with Internet Explorer Mobile, and the BlackBerry Bold and Storm.

The Beta of the app for other phones is scheduled for release in late May. All three Betas will initially be limited to users in the US, Canada, UK, France, Germany, India, Indonesia and the Philippines.

Friday, March 13, 2009

"We Will Look Heavily At Growth Equity Opportunities In 2009": Haque

From the man with the midas touch and one of my favourite VCs active in India.

"We Will Look Heavily At Growth Equity Opportunities In 2009": Haque

February 24 2009, Madhav A. Chanchani, VC Circle

Promod Haque will be less interested in a seed stage internet co in India with an exclusively ad-funded model.

Promod Haque is one of the top venture capitalists in the world. He was ranked number one VC on the annual Forbes Midas List in 2004. Haque, who heads up Norwest Venture Partners as a Managing Partner, has been making investments in India in sectors such as software, communications and internet. VCCircle talks to Haque on the firm's outlook for venture capital investing in 2009.

Will you see a slowdown in venture capital dealmaking in India in 2009?

Our firm doesn't plan to slow down its investment pace in 2009, but the bar on new investments will be extremely high. There are a lot of interesting companies out there looking for funding right now.

Although the current recession is different from the previous downturns, and the industry conditions in venture are difficult, we still see tremendous opportunities at this time. Technology has become an even more pervasive part of business and consumers' lives. As long as there is demand for technology innovation, we believe venture capital will continue to be successful.

The VC business will change, and the best firms will adjust and move with these changes. Venture is a highly cyclical industry, and we believe that this is the best time to invest in venture—particular in India where we still see tremendous growth opportunities.

One thing that differentiates our firm—particularly during this downturn-- is that we're a large global firm that has been around for 47 years with $2.5 billion under management---but more importantly, we've been through the up and down cycles of the tech economy and we've fared well through the downturns in the past.

We believe that raising one global fund is a distinct advantage for our portfolio companies—each investment professional at NVP has a vested interest in our companies globally. We are patient through down cycles, and our partners have deep operating experience and entrepreneurial backgrounds. We think this global approach positions us well to capitalise on the opportunities we continue to see in India—particularly today.

How do you see venture capital exits in 2009? What is your opinion on IPOs and M&A based exits, and how will they fare in this year?

The recession will continue to make it difficult for companies this year. That's why we're working closely with our own portfolio companies to manage their cash during the downturn (as we've done during previous downturns).

We're advising our portfolio companies to be extremely cautious. Based on past experience, we know they will experience a spending squeeze as we have already started to see this year.

It takes longer in this economic climate to reach a meaningful exit (M&A or IPO—and the IPO window hasn't opened yet). Therefore, conserving cash and finding a way to reach cash flow breakeven is critical for these companies.

We still think that companies with strong fundamentals will be rewarded over time. But they need to make it through this tough economic environment—save cash, keep the burn rate down, reach cashflow breakeven sooner, etc.

Do you see valuations changing much in the venture capital sector?

I think they will continue to decrease in the first half of 2009 and then we'll see an uptick when the market begins to recover.

What are the sectors that you will prefer to invest in 2009?

It's difficult to put these sectors in order of preference, because a lot of our investments are dependent upon the types of companies we see, the stage of the company, the market timing, and many other unpredictable factors.

In 2009, we will definitely look more heavily at growth equity opportunities in a variety of sectors. The correction in valuations has created a more viable option for PEs to invest in India, particularly in the coming year.

Also, given the public markets are on hold for IPOs, it is likely that companies who need money will turn to private equity. They can't keep their expansion plans on hold, and we believe that there are tremendous growth equity opportunities across a wide range of sectors in India, including telecom, technology, financial services, infrastructure and manufacturing.

We hired a managing director in our Mumbai office earlier this year to focus on these growth equity opportunities—(Sohil Chand; he was doing private equity investments at Goldman Sachs).

IT-ITES outsourcing has also been a sector that has prospered in India over the last several years, and we are beginning to see the maturity of the second generation services market. We will continue to look closely at this sector in India as we are seeing a lot of interesting businesses in this area.

Lastly, we continue to believe there are significant opportunities in the local consumer markets (both internet and mobile) in India. We think that wireless and broadband penetration will only increase. This combined with a sizeable middle class with high spending power continues to make the investment landscape quite appealing. In 2009, we will seek out appealing businesses in these sectors, but the bar is extremely high on new investments.

What are the sectors that you will not look at investing in 2009?

We would be less interested in a seed stage Internet company in India with an exclusively ad-funded model. More mature Internet companies (that do rely on advertising) that have been demonstrating strong traction in the marketplace do continue to be very interesting to us.

An example of this kind of company is Sulekha.com, one of the most popular Internet media companies in India that reaches and connects millions of Indians worldwide—specifically reaching 44 cities in India, the US and more. The company offers classifieds, yellow pages and localised commerce. We invested in this company a few years back, and we are excited about where Sulekha is headed.

Is there a change in the way you evaluate an investment proposal? Will it take longer for you to close a deal than compared to what you did it at a boom time like 2008 or 2007?

Our criterion hasn't changed in this area. We look at several factors when making investments. We analyse the size of the market (is it large enough?) and we determine whether or not the company is considered to be a breakthrough project with world-class solutions that are highly differentiated.

We also look closely at the domain expertise of the founders and engineers (do they have a proven track record?) and do the entrepreneurs have the true passion and vision to build the company? Lastly, we need to be convinced that the differentiation is defendable, sustainable and offers a unique value proposition to the customer (customer validation, ROI and traction are critical).

Lastly, the business must be capital efficient—particularly in today's economic climate.
The timing of how soon we close a deal now compared to the last few years, really depends on the company. The bar is extremely high when it comes to new investments, and we always do a tremendous amount of due diligence before we close a deal---but this has always been the case and the timing can vary depending on the company, stage and sector in which we are making the investment.

Do you think all your portfolio companies are well capitalised? Are any of your portfolio companies looking to raise next rounds?

Some of our companies will most likely raise funds in 2009, but we are encouraging each portfolio company to conserve as much cash as possible in this tough economic environment. We will continue to fund companies with strong fundamentals.

Do you see a preference towards late/mid-stage deals now?

As I mentioned above, we will definitely look more heavily at growth equity opportunities in a variety of sectors. The correction in valuations has created a more viable option for PEs to invest in India, particularly in the coming year. We will look at all stages in the coming year when evaluating investment opportunities.

Do you see entrepreneurial activity getting stymied because of a negative economic environment? Will entrepreneurs be more risk averse?

Although industry conditions are difficult, we are still seeing tremendous opportunities and are meeting with great entrepreneurs (and repeat entrepreneurs—people whom we've successfully backed before) at this time.

As I mentioned above, as long as there is demand for technology innovation, we believe the smart and passionate entrepreneurs who want to build exciting new companies/technologies will continue to be successful over time (even if it takes them a bit longer to do so).

Many of these entrepreneurs are using this downturn as an opportunity to innovate, capitalize on new prospects and fill market needs. We believe that this is could be the best time to invest in a new venture—some of the best technologies and companies have been built during a downturn.

Made for India: Succeeding in a Market Where One Size Won't Fit All

One size doesn't definitely fit all...and no better proving ground than India. Made for India or customized for India is applicable not only in terms of the product but I believe with respect to all the 4P of marketing be it pricing (famous India sachet pricing is one example), promotion, placement/distribution and promotion

Made for India: Succeeding in a Market Where One Size Won't Fit All

March 12, 2009 in India Knowledge@Wharton

While consumers across the world are seeing a growing number of "Made in India" labels on the goods they buy, Indian shoppers are witnessing a more subtle change. Increasingly, multinational companies are selling products that are not just made in -- but that are made for -- India. Entire generations of Indian consumers, who once felt grateful simply for being able to experience the same brands as the rest of the world, are now realizing they can ask for products that cater to their wants and needs. And they stand a good chance of getting what they want.

"The willingness of big brands to customize their products was never the issue," says Harminder Sahni, managing director of Technopak Advisors India, one of the country's largest management consultancies. "What has changed is that the Indian market has finally reached a critical mass -- after the U.S. and China, this is the largest consumer market in the world -- that justifies the investment." That wasn't always the case. Before the Indian economy opened up in the early 1990s, "imported" goods were a sought-after commodity, their foreignness often being their most desirable attribute. Not surprisingly, then, many multinationals didn't think success would require much effort when their brands finally entered the country after 1991.

Things have changed. As Indian consumers became more aware of trends and advancements in technology, they began to demand similar sophistication. More important, they wanted products built to their needs. That meant not just automobiles, household appliances and consumer electronics, but also mobile phones, foods and apparel. "Earlier, there was a reverence for anything foreign because local products were of terrible quality," says Abraham Koshy, professor of marketing at the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad (IIMA). "But as the market developed, the focus started shifting from the product to the brand. Customers started patronizing a brand only if the product suited them. So the need arose for companies to adjust their products to customers' requirements."

It isn't only about holding on to existing customers. If altering a product's design or introducing a variant will help a brand reach out to an additional customer group, most companies would think it worth the investment. "Brands that establish their relevance with customers do well," says Shripad Nadkarni, director of MarketGate Consulting, a Mumbai-based marketing and brand consultancy. The increasing use of third-party sourcing helps further the customization cause; companies can simply take on additional local suppliers who will adapt the products for different markets and customer groups.

Of course, localization doesn't work for all products. Many high-end luxury goods, for instance, rely on their country-of-origin tag to enhance their brand appeal. A "Made in India" label on these products would be disastrous, says Technopak's Sahni. Koshy adds that products where the unit consumption is low may not justify huge outlays on customization.

'Culturally Sensitive' Food

Variations in consumption patterns across countries, or even regions within countries, usually reflect historical, climatic, economic and cultural differences. But not all these factors are equally important. In her book Consumer Behavior and Culture, Dutch economist Marieke K. de Mooij asserts that "70% of differences between countries with respect to product ownership and usage can be explained by culture."

Nowhere is that more apparent than in food preferences and habits. Across most of the world, Nestlรฉ's Maggi is known best as a soups-and-sauces brand. In India, it has become the generic word for instant noodles. The product sold in India, though, bears little resemblance to the ramen of East Asia. It was introduced in 1982 with a masala (spicy) flavoring and, over the next 25 years, Nestlรฉ continued to launch variants that would appeal to local and regional tastes. Of course, they weren't all equally successful, and the masala variant continues to be Maggi's best seller.

At the other end of the scale, perhaps, is Kellogg India. The breakfast cereal giant has clung to its determination to popularize cold, uncooked breakfasts, even offering corn flakes in ethnic flavors such as mango, honey and saffron. But given Indians' preference for hot meals, Kellogg's is finding that the road to success can be a long one. "Some product categories are more conducive to local interpretation. If you don't honor that, you're likely to remain on a slow growth curve," MarketGate's Nadkarni says. "Food is perhaps the most culturally sensitive category."

The international fast food chains appear to understand the need for product customization particularly well. A significant number of Indians are vegetarian by choice or for religious reasons, and strict taboos remain on the mingling of vegetarian and non-vegetarian foods in the same kitchen or on the same table. McDonald's took note of that as far back as 1990, when it began establishing local supplier partners, six years before it opened its first restaurant in India. Working on its first no-beef, no-pork menu, the company ensured that suppliers respected the beliefs of its future customers. Vegetarian products are prepared with dedicated equipment and utensils and, in some cases, by a separate workforce. All food is cooked in vegetable oil, and the mayonnaise and other sauces do not contain egg (considered a non-vegetarian food). "We understand Indian culture because we were born in it," says Vikram Bakshi, managing director and joint venture partner, McDonald's India (North and East). "Physical separation of vegetarian and non-vegetarian products is maintained right from the farm to the customer."

The Indian operations may have required extra effort, but McDonald's executives say the dedication to local cultures is not new for the company: In the last 50 years, the chain has opened more than 30,000 restaurants in 120 countries (155 in India), adapting its menu and operations to complement existing eating-out options. While the iconic all-beef Big Mac has been replaced by the mutton and chicken Maharaja Mac in India, a kosher variant in Israel is served minus the cheese. In China, McDonald's introduced red bean pies, while Norwegian restaurants offer the salmon McLaks burger. Of course, it helps to have local partners in these markets; about 70% of the chain's restaurants are owned and operated by local entrepreneurs. "Local owners understand what their customers want and, perhaps more important, what is acceptable within local customs and values," Bakshi says.

Some learn that the hard way. When Yum Restaurants India opened the first Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) outlet in Bangalore in the mid-1990s, locals protested about the brand's multinational origins. As the ensuing months proved, it wasn't only KFC's parentage that was too foreign; the chicken wings and wraps it offered were too alien for Indian taste buds. In just a few years, Yum closed all its KFC restaurants in India, and did not relaunch the brand until 2004.

This time, though, the company was more market-savvy. It introduced a vegetarian menu that included rice meals, wraps and side dishes -- the most extensive meat-free menu across the chain's worldwide operations -- and, like McDonald's, stuck to eggless mayonnaise and sauces. Even its trademark chicken dishes were given a local flavor with the use of Indian spices and cooking techniques.

"KFC's strength is our brand-standard products," says Unnat Varma, marketing director of KFC India. "We work around that core and give consumers products with familiar tastes." That is in keeping with an independent study in 2001 by Technopak (then called KSA Technopak), which revealed that 70% of Indians preferred traditional foods and flavors over "Western" foods. The company's new, balanced strategy appears to be working: In four years, KFC has increased its presence in India to 34 outlets, and plans to cross the 100-outlet mark in the next two years. "The vegetarian offerings have made the brand more relevant to a larger section of consumers," says Varma, "and that is necessary for KFC's growth."

In contrast to the KFC experience, Yum Foods' other Indian operation, Pizza Hut, played its cards well right from the start. Within three years of its 1996 launch, Pizza Hut opened its first vegetarian restaurant in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, a state with a large Jain population. Not only did the outlet serve no meat, it also offered a selection of Jain toppings. (The Jain religion proscribes all meat and root vegetables, including ginger, garlic, onion and potato). There are now three all-vegetarian restaurants in India, the only such Pizza Hut outlets in the world. There are other signs of "Indianization": Three years ago, Pizza Hut launched the "Great Indian Treat" product range, its first completely localized menu. Even now, the menu includes a mix of Indian and international ingredients and tastes. Says Anup Jain, director of marketing for Pizza Hut India: "We customize our international flavors to suit local preferences, and 20% of our overall menu is localized. World over, the toppings at Pizza Hut are mainly beef and pepperoni." But in India, where up to 60% of the people are estimated to be vegetarian, "we have more variety in vegetarian toppings."

Practical Considerations

IIMA's Koshy points out that some product localization is the result of requirements that cannot be wished away -- for instance, the need for right-hand-drive cars in India, or electronic equipment that operates at 220 volts. Physical conditions also matter a great deal. The Nokia 1100 is a case in point. Launched in 2003 as an entry-level mobile handset, the 1100 is designed especially for emerging markets such as India, and is the outcome of detailed studies of users and market conditions. The findings? Users in these markets placed a premium on ease of use and durability. A no-frills phone was acceptable as long as it provided necessary services such as text messaging and an alarm clock at an affordable price. The perfect handset would also be hardy enough to withstand India's heat, dust and humidity, and would have a battery that could cope with uncertain recharging schedules, given the erratic power supply.

Accordingly, the 1100 has a dust-free keypad and an anti-slip grip. It also has an alarm clock and a built-in flashlight that can be activated by pressing a single key. It was priced at less than $116, bringing it within reach of consumers from even lower-income groups. Not surprisingly, the 1100 is not just the world's best-selling cellular phone model, but also the best-selling consumer electronics device, having sold some 200 million units since 2003.

The 1100 is not the first example of Nokia's product localization in India. The Finnish company started much earlier with a special edition of its 5110 model. Launched on August 15, 1998, the 5110 celebrated the 51st anniversary of Indian independence with a patriotic ring tone, adapted by the composer and sitar player Ravi Shankar. The next year, Nokia included Bollywood hit songs as ring tones in several handset models and introduced the 3210, which offered a user interface in local languages. Text messaging in Hindi followed soon.

Other mobile handset manufacturers have been offering Indianized models as well. Bollywood themes and regional language text messaging remain the most popular tweaks, but other interesting modifications have been made. For instance, LG launched cricket-based games in some models a few years ago, while Samsung's latest phones are loaded with a traditional Indian calendar. A new series of Sony Ericsson phones include dedicated radio speakers and have AM radio capabilities, a first for the Indian market.

Mobile phones aside, the most common examples of product localization in India are consumer appliances. And, like the 1100, they are mostly the result of market abnormalities. The biggest barriers to increasing washing machine sales in India are the frequent power outages and the uncertain water supply. Whirlpool India kept that in mind and launched a series of semi-automatic washing machines that require less water and fully automatic machines that restart automatically after a power failure. Market leaders LG and Samsung include similar appliances in their India portfolios. Other region-specific products include refrigerators that keep food cold for four to five hours without electricity.

Of course, not all modifications are the result of poor Indian infrastructure. Regional preferences also play a role. LG Electronics India managing director Moon B. Shin says the Korean company's approach to product customization is one not just of localization, but of "micro-localization." Intensive customer research and feedback determine the kind of adaptations to be made to products -- the color of refrigerators, for instance. The generous use of oil and strong spices such as turmeric in Punjabi cooking can stain pastel-colored appliances, which is why more intense shades do particularly well in that market.

Increasingly, the choice of accessories, too, is decided by local requirements. In South India, for instance, most microwave oven starter kits include an idli mold for making the steamed rice dumpling popular in the region. In northern markets, the mold may be replaced by a plate to heat kulcha, a traditional flat bread. "Product customization has to be considered in the social context as well as the physical requirement," IIMA's Koshy points out. "Tastes and habits are very individualistic."

Made for India, and Others

Customizing products for one market doesn't restrict their appeal. On the contrary, many products designed for the Indian consumer could well find takers outside the country, especially in the subcontinent and West Asia. McDonald's, for instance, has already realized the potential of exporting its Indian offerings. Since 2004, the company has been exporting McAloo Tikki burgers, Pizza McPuff and Veg Surprise -- products developed especially for India -- to West Asia.

Consumer electronics company Philips India, too, is benefiting from Indianization experiments. In 2007, the company introduced an intelligent water purifier, which works on ultraviolet light technology -- a product created especially for India. It is now being exported to Eastern Europe, Thailand, Turkey and Brazil. Similarly, a food processor that generates less noise is finding takers in Sri Lanka and West Asia; another model being test marketed, which allows hands-free operation, may find export markets as well.

Tupperware India started operations in India with products selected from its existing international portfolio. Within a few years, though, it had begun modifying products to appeal to Indian consumers and soon began designing specifically for the local market. The spice box is a classic example. Using existing modular containers, Tupperware created an ergonomically sound, rectangular spice box. It was a neat, space-saving design -- and it bombed. The traditional spice box in India is made of metal and is round, with round containers inside. Feedback from the sales force revealed that consumers would accept a plastic alternative, but not an altered shape. Tupperware now sells a round version designed and manufactured in India.

Even the serving spoons in India are custom-made, points out Anshu Bagai, head of marketing for Tupperware India. "The shapes are very different from what is sold in other markets," he says. "Indians have specific designs for serving rice, gravies and dry dishes."

Tupperware India hasn't just introduced new products in India, it has also added new materials. Typically, the company manufactures containers in polypropylene, a cloudy plastic. Given Indian consumer preferences, it has now introduced dinner sets in melamine and upgraded its factory to manufacture polycarbonate, a clear plastic. "Every market is different, but we find customization has to be of a higher degree in India," Bagai says.

"The market size should justify investing in product localization," Technopak's Sahni says. "Product customization is the result of a definite consumer need that has to be served without sacrificing profitability. And consumers will always want something different. There is no such thing as too much customization."

Google Health: helping you better coordinate your care

Digitizing personal health records. This has been a business proposition I have been toying with for some time now :-). Huge opportunity worldwide and particularly for emerging markets like India where digitisation of records is already very limited.

Integrating this with hospitals, healthcare/medical insurance and leading medical practitioners would definitely be next steps.

Google Health: helping you better coordinate your care

3/04/2009, Google Blog

We continue to learn a tremendous amount since launching Google Health in the spring of 2008. We're listening to feedback from users every day about their needs, and one issue we hear regularly is that people want help coordinating their care and the care of loved ones. They want the ability to share their medical records and personal health information with trusted family members, friends, and doctors in their care network. I can relate to this.

Just a few years ago, my father suffered a minor heart attack and was sent to the ER. I arrived on the scene in a panic, and was asked what medications he was taking. To my surprise, I had no clue. If my father had a Google Health account, and had shared his profile with me, I would have been up-to-date on his current medications.

I'm happy to announce today Google Health has addressed this issue with the release of a new "Share this profile" feature enabling Google Health users to invite others they trust (whether it's a family member, a trusted care network provider, friends, and/or a doctor) to view their medical records and personal health information.

Log into Google Health, click on "Share this Profile," and type in the email address of the person with whom you'd like to share your profile. Google Health will send an email to them with a link to view your profile. The link will only work in connection with the email address of that person — your profile can't be accessed if the link is forwarded on. You can stop sharing at any time, and you can always see who has access to your information. Those who are viewing your profile can only see the profile you share — not any other one in your account. We've also built in some extra protections to make sure your health information stays safe, private, and under your control:
  • The sharing link in the email expires after 30 days, but the sharing access itself does not expire — it will stay in place until the user decides to stop sharing
  • Viewers can only see — not edit — your Google Health profile
  • You can review a user activity report to see who has viewed your profile
For doctors and family members who are not yet online, we've also made it easier to share a hard copy of your information via our new printing feature. The wallet format prints a wallet-sized card that includes a user's medications, and allergies; the PDF format prints a letter-sized copy of a user's profile, including medications, allergies, conditions, and treatments.

Finally, we've launched a new graphing feature that helps patients visualize their medical test information. This is great for, say, someone who has high cholesterol. They can use Google Health to enter their lab results on a monthly basis and see the trend over time.

There is still a lot more work to do on Google Health, and we're excited to keep hearing from you so we can continue to make improvements. For now, we hope this new sharing feature makes coordinating your care, or the care of loved ones, a little easier.

Google Also Likes To Use FriendFeed For R&D, Reader Gets Conversations


Social Networking is increasingly pervading all aspects of our life

Google Also Likes To Use FriendFeed For R&D, Reader Gets Conversations
by Jason Kincaid, TechCrunch on March 11, 2009

It looks like Facebook isn’t the only site to draw inspiration from FriendFeed. Google Reader has just launched a new feature that gives users the ability to comment on items that have been shared by their friends, allowing them to hold conversations focusing on each individual story. In other words, it does almost exactly the same thing as FriendFeed (at least for stories shared through Google Reader).

There are a few key distinctions. For one, conversations in Google Reader are only be visible to friends of the user who originally shared a story (FriendFeed allows comments to be displayed to the public with input from users who aren’t your friends). But Google’s blog post notes that it has more for its new comment system on the way, and it wouldn’t be surprising if public sharing is on the roadmap.

Also important to note is that there’s apparently no way to export the conversations that are held on Google Reader. While this is likely because of the private nature of the conversations, it can’t be welcome news to services like FriendFeed, which thrive on being able to import activity from other sites.

We’ve heard that Google has been toying with this idea since at least 2007, when we noted why some blog owners may well be opposed to it. For those blogs that send out full feeds (rather than summaries or the first paragraph of their posts), this new feature could potentially move the conversation away from the blog and onto Google Reader.

Google Reader starts a conversation

3/11/2009, Google Blog

I'm a big fan of sharing (might be all those lessons I learned in kindergarten). And when I share something, it's always nice to get a response like "Thanks!" or "That was the funniest thing I've ever read!" Whether you're 5 or 50, you're more likely to share other awesome things if you know people are excited to hear what you have to say.

Google Reader makes it easy to read and share your favorite articles, blogs, and videos. In the last year, we've added new features to Reader like the ability to choose friends and share items with a note. But it did occur to us that the sharing process was incomplete -- there was no way to have conversations with friends about all those shared items.

That's why we're excited to announce that starting today, your friends will be able to reply to shared items with comments, allowing you to have conversations with your friends right inside Reader. Comments can only be seen by friends of the person who originally shared the item.
To get started, click "Comment View" at the top of your Friends' shared items in Reader, or just write a comment by clicking "Add comment" at the bottom of any shared item. For more details on how comments work, check out the Google Reader blog.


Microsoft unveils developer strategy for Marketplace

Another app stores has its wheels rolling. This is becoming very interesting to say the least ! Easy to emulate difficult to operationalize given the array of devices on Windows Mobile

Re: Nokia2.0: If someone is interested in one market inlettligence solution...
Microsoft Releases SDK, Guidelines for Developers
By Andrew Berg
WirelessWeek - March 11, 2009

Microsoft today announced new details about how developers can build and sell applications for Windows phones through Windows Marketplace for Mobile, the recently announced application marketplace available with the Windows Mobile 6.5 operating system.

Windows Marketplace for Mobile, which has yet to open, joins a long list of platform- and handset-based mobile application stores looking to generate revenue via unique content. Apple’s App Store has been one of the standout cases, generating 500 million downloads in its first six months.

Revenue sharing for the store will echo Apple’s current policy, with 70 percent of profits going to developers and 30 percent to Microsoft. A software developer kit (SDK) is now available for download online.

Microsoft also followed Apple’s lead by charging developers a $99 registration fee. Up to five application submissions to Windows Marketplace for Mobile is included in the introductory annual registration fee. Each additional submission within the annual period will cost $99.

The registration fee is reportedly waived for student developers who want to reach Windows phone customers through enrollment in the Microsoft DreamSpark program.

Developer frustration has been exacerbated recently by the increasingly fragmented world of mobile application development. Each device, platform and carrier essentially requires its own version of any given application, making broad reach a real problem for smaller developers.

The Eclipse Foundation yesterday announced Pulsar, a new industry initiative to define and create a standard mobile application development tools platform. The initiative is led by Motorola, Nokia and Genuitec. Participating members also include IBM, Research In Motion (RIM) and Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications.

“Today, each of the OEMs provides their own set of tools. It’s quite difficult. Quite a challenge for developers,” says Dino Brusco, director of Developer Platforms and Services at Motorola.

“By providing a common development environment defined collaboratively across the mobile industry, the Eclipse Pulsar Platform is enabling more developers to create innovative applications for multiple devices,” Brusco says.

While the Pulsar Initiative aims at unifying OEMs, it won’t solve the problem of different platforms, and there are no signs that Apple, Microsoft or Android will be working together to develop such standards on the platform side.

Apple has set a high bar for success in the world of mobile application stores. The similarity between Microsoft’s developer guidelines and Apple’s seems to further validate the App Store’s formula. But however similar they may be, it looks as though fragmentation will continue to drive competition.


Vodafone Music Store axes DRM

Moving to the DRM free regime. Only way for legit digital music to still make some money ? This just accelerates a free legit music regime. So wheres the business model ??

Vodafone Music Store axes DRM

12/03/2009 - by TelecomTV

Vodafone has announced it's going with the general flow and ditching Digital Rights Management (DRM) from its music catalogue this summer.

That means Vodafone's music can be downloaded as a standard MP3 file and used on any digital device without hindrance. The old system of DRM didn't allow this and therefore turned users off 'legal' digital downloading.

Vodafone says it's the first mobile network operator to take the DRM-free path and it's managed to do deals with heavy-weight record companies Universal, Sony and EMI (Warner, another of the big boys, isn't yet signed).

Nevertheless, Vodafone says it has over 1 million 'tracks' (this stone-age nomenclature will have to change, Dude) from every genre available on the Vodafone Music Store and files downloaded with DRM before the change can be upgraded free to MP3.

Vodafone says New Zealand, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK will drop DRM first this summer and the remaining Vodafone territories will follow soon after.

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Be very afraid: Google Voice has landed

What a start to 2009 for Google. Latitude and now Google Voice

Google moves voice communications to the cloud. It's a new way to approach voice communications: by taking voice and turning it into a Gmail-like service.

You now have a Google number - One number for handling all your calls and sms including - Making calls (free anywhere in the US), receiving calls (route calls to any/all your phones), call screening (including listening in & blocking calls), sms (including sending, archiving & organising) and groups support.

Voice features supported include conference calling, ability to switch phones during a call, call recording, voice based local search/directory service and group management.

The voice mail feature supports voicemail transcripts, unified online voice mail box, personalized greetings, sharing and notifications.

These are essentially a Microsoft Office-type suite of communications-related services.

Google seems to have brought it all together. Unified communications has been a buzzword in the telecoms world for nearly a decade but it never took off due to carrier dependencies and practical on-ground implementation issues. Google I guess would feel its cracked the code and brought it all together by taking voice communications to the cloud, thereby virtually bypassing the operator and eliminating most practical issues.

The interesting point is to see how it evolves. I would predict two things -

(i) Google would push for Google Voice to be included in the gamut of number portability = You could port your existing fixed, mobile, voice # to Google Voice service
(ii) Your # would eventually become your gmail ID as Google pushes for a single online identity
(iii) Context (Maps) gets integrated

So who is going to be running scared - VoIP service providers, fixed and mobile operators. I will let you hazard that guess

Be very afraid: Google Voice has landed

12/03/2009 - by Ian Scales, Telecom TV

Today is the day many in the telecoms industry have been expecting (and, let's face it, fearing) for years... well for at least 18 months. For it was in July 2007, after much rumour and speculation, that Google bought an Internet-based voice service called GrandCentral and locked itself in a room with it. Today it's revealed what it's been up to all that time. Google has entered the voice market.

If you have a Gmail account you tend to look at the page layout and feel that there's something missing.. well you do if you're in telecoms.

Down the left side is a list of all your email contacts. If they too are Gmail users there is a 'presence' function working away so you can hit the 'chat' button and have an instant messaging conversation. In the contact view you can enter their telephone numbers as well as their email addresses.

You're left thinking: 'All the elements are in place, so where's the 'call' button?'

It's about to arrive. Google has announced Google Voice, an add-on service to the Google comms applications set that will do just that.

This is not VoIP (at least not yet). It's web-enabled telephony along the lines of the service offered by Jajah as we in fact predicted it might in an earlier (almost right) story last year.

Instead of handling the media plane (trying to get IP voice streams to struggle across access networks, like Skype) Google, like Jajah, handles the upper levels of the control plane by sitting in the centre of the network and running a presence and availability function for its users and, as the old GrandCentral name implies, enabling them to manage incoming calls (from a GrandCentral number) and initiate outgoing ones.

The service will be available first in the US and then will be extended to other countries.

In fact the key thrust of GrandCentral when bought by Google reflected the oddity of the US voice market in that it concentrated on managing incoming calls which, if they're to a mobile, get paid for by the recipient rather than the caller.

So the big selling point in the US is to be able to screen calls as they come in (Google says, just as you used to with the old-fashioned home message machine) and to route them to the appropriate phone (the landline you happen to be beside preferably).

Other features on Google Voice include an automated voicemail transcription service and the ability to send and receive text messages.

Users can also make free calls TO any number in the US using the calling feature. Like Jajah, Google Voice will initiate outgoing calls (and set up conference calls).

The user can click on a name and Google calls a user-designated phone (preferably on the desk beside the computer) and then makes a connection to the target phone (the call recipient).

Google is currently saying it wants to make its local calls free. While this is practical in the US because of the interconnect and accounting rules there, Google will have to charge for international calls and users can purchase credits to make them, although there is no information yet on rates.

The 'paid-for' charging model will almost certainly have to apply to the rest of the world where interconnect is charged on a per minute basis, unless it plans on absorbing the wholesale call charges for both the initiating and terminating call segments and pay for them through advertising. That really would revolutionise global telephony!

The really interesting thing is where all this goes with Android (or any browser-equipped smartphone for that matter). If Nokia was reportedly in hot water with some mobile carriers by putting Skype on one of its smartphones, then mobile operators must be doubly worried by the prospect of Google disintermediating them by offering call control via the Internet.

And then there's Android. With Google Voice as it's currently offered, operators are being consigned to the role of 'voice pipe' in the Google environment. They still get to set up and manage calls, but they must provide them wholesale to Google.

Now, with Android, Google has the ability to completely disintermediate the mobile operators by setting up VoIP clients on the handsets (like Skype) and transferring all the voice value to the bit pipe, completely under its own control.

Google is currently saying that these are early days and that there are many fascinating developments to come. We can bet on it.

Here comes Google Voice

3/11/2009, Google Mobile Blog

We've just started to release a preview of Google Voice, an application that helps you better manage your voice communications. Google Voice will be available initially to existing users of GrandCentral, a service we acquired in July of 2007.

The new application improves the way you use your phone. You can get transcripts of your voicemail (see the video below) and archive and search all of the SMS text messages you send and receive. You can also use the service to make low-priced international calls and easily access Goog-411 directory assistance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DRGMOXMSmM&eurl=http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/here-comes-google-voice.html&feature=player_embedded

As you may know, GrandCentral offers many great features, including a single number to ring your home, work, and mobile phones, a central voicemail inbox that you could access on the web, and the ability to screen calls by listening in live as callers leave a voicemail. You'll find these features, and more, in the Google Voice preview. Check out the features page for videos and more information on how these features work.

If you're already using GrandCentral, over the next couple days, you will receive instructions in your GrandCentral inbox on how to start using Google Voice. We'll be opening it up to others soon, so if you'd like to be notified when that happens, please send us your email address.



Banner
Google Voice is currently open only for GrandCentral users Learn More

Google number
- One number for all your calls and SMS
Features_thumb1


Google voicemail - Voicemail as easy as email, with transcripts
Features_thumb2


Voice features - More cool things you can do with Google Voice
Features_thumb3