Friday, November 27, 2009

Get mobile coupons through Local Search

Enhancing the value of local search.


Areas with huge potential and for the time has definitely come given the rapid proliferation of GPS in mobile devices and better (broader and deeper) map content - Targeted advertising (though it might sound a bit cliche given earlier attempts) + Mobile coupons (and they can also can overlap).


Both in my opinion would be very relevant and acceptable in a market like India even in a push mode (given privacy and intrusion issues in other markets with push)

Get mobile coupons through Local Search

Monday, November 23, 2009 

Since we launched printable coupons on Google Maps a few years ago, people are increasingly using their mobile phones to find local information when they're away from a computer. With more of you going mobile to search for this information, it makes sense for coupons to go mobile too.

So just in time for the holidays, we've made it easier to find discounts when you're on the go. If a business adds a mobile coupon to its Google Local Business Center listing, you'll be able to access it from your mobile device. Just go to google.com on your phone and search for a local business. When you land on its Place Page, you'll see any coupons or discounts that might be available. Then simply show the participating business the coupon, right from your phone, to redeem the offer.

We hope you find these mobile coupons useful and that they help you save money, trees (fewer printed coupons), and your hands (from paper cuts) when you're on the go. Mobile coupons are currently only available in the US. For more information check out the Lat Long Blog.

Saturday, November 21, 2009

Developers get preview of Google Chrome OS

This is faster than was expected though its not in beta yet and as promised all apps running on the platform are web apps. Will Chrome and Android merge at some point in the not so distant future. I expect so with Chrome being the default OS with variants for the desktop and mobile

Open source fever continues to grip the industry as web giant Google on Thursday open sourced its forthcoming operating system and released preview code to developers ahead of the platform’s official launch in 2010.
Google may well have set Microsoft quaking in its boots back in July, when it announced plans to launch a full fledged operating system, bringing its efforts in the web browser and small footprint operating system spaces together. Google Chrome OS, with the open source project dubbed Chromium, marks a further encroachment on Microsoft’s territory and reinforces speculation on the firm’s plans for world domination.

Chrome OS is all about the web and all applications running on the platform will be web apps, with the entire experience taking place within the browser. “This means users do not have to deal with installing, managing and updating programs,” Google said. This approach should also make things more secure because every application will be sandboxed. And speed is also of the essence, with Google specifying hardware components the OS will run on, such as solid state memory only, no disk drives.

When it was announced, Sundar Pichai, VP of product management at Google, described Chrome OS a lightweight operating system that will initially be targeted at netbooks. The OS is designed to be fast and lightweight and get users onto the web in a few seconds where most of the user experience takes place, with a minimal user interface.

Essentially, the platform will be Google’s Chrome browser running within a new windowing system on top of a Linux kernel. The OS will run on both x86 as well as ARM chips pitching it at the mobile and desktop markets, and for application developers, the web is the platform, using standard technologies that run on Chrome, Windows, MacOS and Linux.

Google has already won support for Chrome OS from a handful of key players in the netbook and mobile computing spaces, including Acer, Adobe, ASUS, Freescale, Hewlett-Packard, Lenovo, Qualcomm, Texas Instruments, and Toshiba.

Mobile phone trackable & swallowable e-pill sensors coming soon



Interesting. Mobile phones can and probably will play key role in education, health care and governance particularly in emerging markets

19 November 2009 15:57 GMT / By Duncan Geere

Swallowable pills that contain sensors could be just around the corner. A company called Proteus Biomedical is working with Qualcomm to build both pills and patches that can monitor your vital signs and send them to a mobile device.

The idea is that those with chronic health problems can be kept an eye on - these "smart" pills can tell if you're taking your medication or not, and notify either you or your doctor/nurse. However, the pills and patches can also be used as more of a preventative option - one of the first signs of cardiac arrest is a buildup of body liquid and the sensors embedded inside can detect this.

The sensors contained in the pills and patches can monitor temperature, motion, respiration and your heart rate. The pills have a "wet battery" that's activated when it hits your stomach, and the patch contains an external battery. Both connect wirelessly to an external unit, like a mobile phone, which then uploads your data to a private database on the Web.

The company says that it's seeing interest from healthcare organisations across the world, but that the UK's NHS was yet to bite. Developing countries like China are expected to be the first to try out these new technologies, as they don't have the established infrastructure of more developed nations.

Would you take a "smart pill" that monitors your vitals? Or is that a little too creepy? Tell us in the comments box below.

Friday, November 20, 2009

Gartner Top 10 consumer obile applications for 2012

I would add Mobile TV, Education, Local Search (over generic search), Mobile SN and Apps

Cellular News, November 18, 2009

Gartner has identified its top 10 consumer mobile applications for 2012. Gartner listed applications based on their impact on consumers and industry players, considering revenue, loyalty, business model, consumer value and estimated market penetration.


"Consumer mobile applications and services are no longer the prerogative of mobile carriers," said Sandy Shen, research director at Gartner. "The increasing consumer interest in smartphones, the participation of Internet players in the mobile space, and the emergence of application stores and cross-industry services are reducing the dominance of mobile carriers. Each player will influence how the application is delivered and experienced by consumers, who ultimately vote with their attention and spending power."


"The ultimate competition between industry players is for control of the 'ecosystem' and user experience, and the owner of the ecosystem will benefit the most in terms of revenue and user loyalty," Ms. Shen said. "We predict that most users will use no more than five mobile applications at a time and most future opportunities will come from niche market 'killer applications'."
The top 10 consumer mobile applications in 2012 will include:

No. 1: Money Transfer

This service allows people to send money to others using Short Message Service (SMS). Its lower costs, faster speed and convenience compared with traditional transfer services have strong appeal to users in developing markets, and most services signed up several million users within their first year. However, challenges do exist in both regulatory and operational risks. Because of the fast growth of mobile money transfer, regulators in many markets are piling in to investigate the impact on consumer costs, security, fraud and money laundering. On the operational side, market conditions vary, as do the local resources of service providers, so providers need different market strategies when entering a new territory.

No. 2: Location-Based Services

Location-based services (LBS) form part of context-aware services, a service that Gartner expects will be one of the most disruptive in the next few years. Gartner predicts that the LBS user base will grow globally from 96 million in 2009 to more than 526 million in 2012. LBS is ranked No. 2 in Gartner's top 10 because of its perceived high user value and its influence on user loyalty. Its high user value is the result of its ability to meet a range of needs, ranging from productivity and goal fulfillment to social networking and entertainment.

No. 3: Mobile Search

The ultimate purpose of mobile search is to drive sales and marketing opportunities on the mobile phone. To achieve this, the industry first needs to improve the user experience of mobile search so that people will come back again. Mobile search is ranked No. 3 because of its high impact on technology innovation and industry revenue. Consumers will stay loyal to some search services, but instead of sticking to one or two search providers on the Internet, Gartner expects loyalty on the mobile phone to be shared between a few search providers that have unique technologies for mobile search.

No. 4: Mobile Browsing

Mobile browsing is a widely available technology present on more than 60 percent of handsets shipped in 2009, a percentage Gartner expects to rise to approximately 80 percent in 2013. Gartner has ranked mobile browsing No. 4 because of its broad appeal to all businesses. Mobile Web systems have the potential to offer a good return on investment. They involve much lower development costs than native code, reuse many existing skills and tools, and can be agile - both delivered and updated quickly. Therefore, the mobile Web will be a key part of most corporate business-to-consumer (B2C) mobile strategies.

No. 5: Mobile Health Monitoring

Mobile health monitoring is the use of IT and mobile telecommunications to monitor patients remotely, and could help governments, care delivery organizations (CDOs) and healthcare payers reduce costs related to chronic diseases and improve the quality of life of their patients. In developing markets, the mobility aspect is key as mobile network coverage is superior to fixed network in the majority of developing countries. Currently, mobile health monitoring is at an early stage of market maturity and implementation, and project rollouts have so far been limited to pilot projects. In the future, the industry will be able to monetize the service by offering mobile healthcare monitoring products, services and solutions to CDOs.

No. 6: Mobile Payment

Mobile payment usually serves three purposes. First, it is a way of making payment when few alternatives are available. Second, it is an extension of online payment for easy access and convenience. Third, it is an additional factor of authentication for enhanced security. Mobile payment made Gartner's top 10 list because of the number of parties it affects - including mobile carriers, banks, merchants, device vendors, regulators and consumers - and the rising interest from both developing and developed markets. Because of the many choices of technologies and business models, as well as regulatory requirements and local conditions, mobile payment will be a highly fragmented market. There will not be standard practices of deployment, so parties will need to find a working solution on a case-by-case basis.

No. 7: Near Field Communication Services

Near field communication (NFC) allows contactless data transfer between compatible devices by placing them close to each other, within ten centimeters. The technology can be used, for example, for retail purchases, transportation, personal identification and loyalty cards. NFC is ranked No. 7 in Gartner's top ten because it can increase user loyalty for all service providers, and it will have a big impact on carriers' business models. However, its biggest challenge is reaching business agreement between mobile carriers and service providers, such as banks and transportation companies. Gartner expects to see large-scale deployments starting from late 2010, when NFC phones are likely to ship in volume, with Asia leading deployments followed by Europe and North America.

No. 8: Mobile Advertising

Mobile advertising in all regions is continuing to grow through the economic downturn, driven by interest from advertisers in this new opportunity and by the increased use of smartphones and the wireless Internet. Total spending on mobile advertising in 2008 was $530.2 million, which Gartner expects to will grow to $7.5 billion in 2012. Mobile advertising makes the top 10 list because it will be an important way to monetize content on the mobile Internet, offering free applications and services to end users. The mobile channel will be used as part of larger advertising campaigns in various media, including TV, radio, print and outdoors.

No. 9: Mobile Instant Messaging

Price and usability problems have historically held back adoption of mobile instant messaging (IM), while commercial barriers and uncertain business models have precluded widespread carrier deployment and promotion. Mobile IM is on Gartner's top 10 list because of latent user demand and market conditions that are conducive to its future adoption. It has a particular appeal to users in developing markets that may rely on mobile phones as their only connectivity device. Mobile IM presents an opportunity for mobile advertising and social networking, which have been built into some of the more advanced mobile IM clients.

No. 10: Mobile Music

Mobile music so far has been disappointing - except for ring tones and ring-back tones, which have turned into a multibillion-dollar service. On the other hand, it is unfair to dismiss the value of mobile music, as consumers want music on their phones and to carry it around. We see efforts by various players in coming up with innovative models, such as device or service bundles, to address pricing and usability issues. iTunes makes people pay for music, which shows that a superior user experience does make a difference.


Android serves up Eclair

Android serves up Eclair

Developer of the Android mobile operating system, the Open Handset Alliance (OHA), has released the source code for version 2.0 of the platform, until now only seen on the Motorola Droid.

Android 2.0, otherwise known as ‘Éclair’, includes new features such as support for multiple accounts, quick access to contact information, support for Exchange, search functionality for SMS, flash support for the camera, digital zoom, support for a virtual keyboard, with an improved keyboard layout, support for double tap zoom and a refreshed interface for the web browser along with support for HTML5 .

Interestingly, within a few hours of the source code being released, the Android hacker community had got version 2.0 up and running on the oldest Android device available – the G1 – despite the fact it would be unable to handle the latest incarnation of the platform.

New User Features

Quick Contact for Android

Multiple Accounts

Messaging Search

Email Combined Inbox

Camera Modes

Contacts and accounts

  • Multiple accounts can be added to a device for email and contact synchronization, including Exchange accounts. (Handset manufacturers can choose whether to include Exchange support in their devices.)
  • Developers can create sync adapters that provide synchronization with additional data sources.
  • Quick Contact for Android provides instant access to a contact's information and communication modes. For example, a user can tap a contact photo and select to call, SMS, or email the person. Other applications such as Email, Messaging, and Calendar can also reveal the Quick Contact widget when you touch a contact photo or status icon.

Email

  • Exchange support.
  • Combined inbox to browse email from multiple accounts in one page.

Messaging

  • Search functionality for all saved SMS and MMS messages.
  • Auto delete the oldest messages in a conversation when a defined limit is reached.

Camera

  • Built-in flash support
  • Digital zoom
  • Scene mode
  • White balance
  • Color effect
  • Macro focus

Android virtual keyboard

  • An improved keyboard layout to makes it easier to hit the correct characters and improve typing speed.
  • The framework's multi-touch support ensures that key presses aren't missed while typing rapidly with two fingers.
  • A smarter dictionary learns from word usage and automatically includes contact names as suggestions.

Browser

  • Refreshed UI with actionable browser URL bar enables users to directly tap the address bar for instant searches and navigation.
  • Bookmarks with web page thumbnails.
  • Support for double-tap zoom.
  • Support for HTML5:
    • Database API support, for client-side databases using SQL.
    • Application cache support, for offline applications.
    • Geolocation API support, to provide location information about the device.
    • tag support in fullscreen mode.

Calendar

  • Agenda view provides infinite scrolling.
  • Events indicate the attending status for each invitee.
  • Invite new guests to events.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Will India Produce A Google?

Columnist Image

India will see birth of new billion dollar companies who leverage technology rather than make an innovation themselves.

I am sitting at Changi Airport of Sngapore as I write this piece, having just spent a couple of very interesting days at a conference titled “Leapfrogging Technologies” run by a group called TTI Vanguard which has on its advisory board a few legends including Nicholas Negraponte, Alan Kay, Len Kleinrock, Gordon Bell etc.

I had the honor of presenting the realities of India, and the various challenges and opportunities that exist here. Much time was spent at that conference debating the definition of “leapfrogging technology”. It was very clear that the audience, consisting primarily of senior technology executives of large multinationals, were technology biased, in the traditional sense.

In other words, the way Silicon Valley might think of leapfrogging in true high tech fashion (megabits/sec to gigabits/sec; order of magnitude better or faster). But towards the end of the conference after looking at examples in India, Bangladesh and Philippines, many realised that leapfrogging often has as much to do with technology application, often with a local twist, as it does with technology development. Let me explain further.

Admittedly VCs (including myself) have been harsh with the Indian entrepreneurial community for not being innovative enough, not thinking big and thinking incremental rather than monumental. Call it an epiphany or just a delayed “wake up call”, I am changing my thought process.

Leapfrogging In Indian Context

In India and many other developing economies, at this stage, it’s quite honestly less about groundbreaking technology development (except perhaps the MNC R&D hubs), and much more about leveraging existing technology to significantly impact quality of life, and making a business of it.

And of course, the scale in terms of number lives impacted is potentially earth-shattering in India and other developing nations. Take mobile telephony, for example. That definitely represents leapfrogging, since legacy infrastructure didn’t really exist to adequately serve a country of over a billion people. Obviously the mobile phone, once affordable, has led to over 400M subscribers on its way to many hundreds of millions more.

There were innovations along the way with respect to distribution, business model, and generally getting the scale the telecommunication sector has achieved in India. Similarly, dish has gained traction where no landline infrastructure exists (I love seeing them on top of slums, for example); and surely wireless broadband will eventually break through where no optical fiber or copper has been buried underground.

At the conference, I also had a good chance to interact with several Chinese entrepreneurs and investors. After speaking with them, and also looking at the recent success stories that have come out of China, the point that hit me like a Dhoni chauka (for readers in the US, use a 2x4 as a metaphor) across the face was the fact that companies like Baidu, Sohu, Alibaba, Ctrip, Focusmedia are Chinese companies that became massive while focusing (at least initially) only on the Chinese market.

They could do it better than their US counterparts partly due to language and cultural understanding, some technology and I would argue partially due to national pride. Similarly if we look at India, companies are emerging and will continue to emerge in a broad range of categories targeting the Indian market.

Local Winners, Local Advantage

Let’s take travel, for example. Cleartrip and Makemytrip, not Expedia or Travelocity are recognised names. For online jobs, it’s Naukri, not Monster. In matrimonial, it’s shaadi or bharatmatrimony, not match.com. Even in local search, the number one name is not Google, but Just Dial, which, by the way, gained momentum not from the new media (online, mobile) but from the old one (plain old telephony).

Then there are completely “Greenfield” areas where India holds tremendous potential. In consumer media, one could argue that India currently does not have its Amazon, eBay or Craigslist (at least at any decent scale). The entire area of online and mobile commerce holds tremendous promise. There is no real e-commerce or m-commerce for hard goods (travel, matrimonial, movie tickets are early successes for obvious reasons), due to lack of both remote transacting capabilities in many cases (credit card penetration); logistics and distribution (reverse and forward logistics) and sheer trust for online or remote transactions.

But Amazon didn’t become today’s Amazon on day 1. It took years, just like it will take years in India. But whether it is broadband connectivity (mobile and fixed); credit card worthiness platform (a la FICO score in the US) or a reliable logistics infrastructure, opportunities exist for startups to truly have an impact in making the remote commerce dream become reality, and by doing so, create India’s own online giants.

Opportunities

There are significant opportunities wherever one looks – in healthcare, education, energy/power, water, transportation and list goes on and on. Let me delineate a couple. The area of healthcare provides phenomenal opportunity. Indian lifestyle (fried food, lack of exercise) as well as hereditary linkages mean that India is a time bomb waiting to explode when it comes to diseases like diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease.

Opportunity exists to create an HMO like infrastructure (without hopefully the juggernaut that has been created in the US) that truly ties insurance, pharmacies, and the medical community. On the energy/power front, there are 400M people in this country without access to electricity. That problem won’t be solved by extending the grid necessarily, but rather by generating distributed power (locally produced; locally used). By the way, DFJ and Cisco recently sponsored the first ever Global Business Plan competition in June of this year.

Scores of plans were submitted by entrepreneurs from around the world including China, Russia, Israel, all across Europe, Latin America and of course, the US. The winner was not some quantum leap technical innovation, but rather a small company called Husk Power, with its base in Bihar, India. Husk Power is using crop husk as feedstock for distributed power generation in villages with several pilot plants already up and running. Again, this is an example of using existing technology, with more of an Indian wrapper, to address a potentially multi-billion dollar market that will lead to successful companies here locally.

The entrepreneurial success stories of the next decade or two will come from companies that are at least mostly, if not exclusively targeting the local Indian market, and within large and growing Greenfield spaces, only some of which are mentioned above.

Bottom Of The Pyramid

Then there is the entire bottom of the pyramid piece with massive opportunity around the same sectors as previously mentioned (telecommunications, education, healthcare, water, power) but with its own set of challenges around distribution, payments etc., but those issues will be addressed over time creating several large companies in the process.

The question that was asked of me at the conference was “will India produce a Google?” My answer was a very convincing “yes and no”. If one is asking the question from a technology innovation bias, then the answer is “no”, at least not in the near future (IMHO). But if one is asking whether new billion dollar companies will be created in India that leverage technology, then the answer is an absolute “yes”. Whether that happens in the next four-five years, I don’t know, but will it happen over the next decade, absolutely.

Leapfrogging: Developed Vs Developing Nations

Coming back to the point of leapfrogging, in developing nations, I would argue leapfrogging comes often as a result of Greenfield opportunities like mobile phones leapfrogging fixed infrastructure, or wimax leapfrogging landline infrastructure, dish leapfrogging analog TV, essentially where the inertia of legacy infrastructure doesn’t exist. Leapfrogging in developed nations usually involves quantum leap in technology itself or getting a whole lot more out of existing infrastructure since that investment has to be recouped. While developed nations think about better, faster, cheaper the developing nations are simply thinking of “anything at all”.

I think innovation or leapfrogging has its spectrum. When a country has nothing, going to something at all is considered leapfrogging, usually having nothing to do with technology improvement or invention, but rather either process innovation or pure execution utilising existing solutions. The next phase most likely is indianising the product or process.

To give an example, one of DFJ’s portfolio companies is Attero, an electronic waste recycling startup based in Noida (near Delhi in Uttar Pradesh). They have licensed some parts of the process but rather than fully automating the system, they have used inexpensive but readily available and trainable labour to create a more cost-effective recycling process.

Only once the existing technology is saturated or close to it, does there come a necessity to innovate as a grassroots technology level. The key question is whether India will feel that necessity or desire (one could argue that Israel doesn’t need to invent - outside of defense perhaps - but has an intellectual capital and sheer desire to do so). Finally, there needs to be an ecosystem for entrepreneurs (specially for technology entrepreneurs that US VCs tend to be biased towards) that is just starting in India. Fear of failure and stigma attached to it still exists. There is a lack of seed capital in the country to really get startups off the ground. Some are doing their part, no doubt, but much more needs to be done.

Bottom line: India is a goldmine of opportunity for smart teams that can truly execute on vast spaces. I predict that those same large spaces will produce several billion dollar enterprise value companies over the next decade. There may not be leapfrogging technology that comes out of India in the near future for the world to adopt, but phenomenal sustainable success stories will be created in India (initially for the Indian market) that leverage technology in interesting ways, and execute flawlessly to create our own version of Google, Cisco and Apple.

What EA Sees in Social Gamer Playfish

The potential clearly is on account of the virality/network effect. The long-term question is whether such a business model has staying power. What you need is the sheer number of people to make those micro-transactions work. It's sustainable if the numbers are maintained.

Electronic Arts' acquisition of London-based Playfish shows what a powerhouse social networking has become for the video game industry

By Jack Ewing, Businessweek, November 9, 2009

Games company Electronic Arts agreed on Nov. 9 to pay $400 million for a company whose products include virtual hot dogs, bazookas, and turnips. Wacky? Maybe, but the deal by EA, based in Redwood City, Calif., to buy London-based Playfish illustrates how quickly social networking has become a force in the video game industry.

Playfish CEO Kristian Segerstrale and several partners founded the company barely two years ago, betting that Facebook and other social network sites would open a new arena for online gaming. Instead of interacting with strangers, people could play with friends. "If you're involved with your real-life friends, things matter more," Segerstrale says. "It just becomes emotionally more interesting."

Playfish launched its first game, called Pet Society, in December 2007, just two months after founding the company. Segerstrale, a Finn, and his partners spread the game around the Internet by getting 100 of their own friends to join. Today Playfish offers 10 games and is the second-largest social network gaming company after San-Francisco-based Zynga, best known for Mafia Wars and FarmVille.

Smartphone-Savvy

With about 60 million users a month for all its games, Playfish boasts slightly less than half Zynga's total. But that was still plenty to attract the attention of EA. Like Zynga, Playfish has benefited not only from the rise of social media but also the burgeoning phenomenon of downloadable apps for PCs and smartphones such as the Apple (AAPL) iPhone, which has allowed for explosive growth in its user community. Playfish already sells one iPhone game and has two more on the way.

The company doesn't release detailed financial information, but "it went from a standstill to being profitable very quickly," says Kevin Comolli, a partner at venture capital firm Accel Partners, which was Playfish's first backer. Comolli declines to say what kind of payoff Accel is getting for its May 2008 investment in Playfish, but it's obviously many multiples of the original $8.4 million. "It's a very good return for us and our investors," he says. Accel was also the first VC investor in Facebook. Under the terms of the Playfish acquisition, Electronic Arts will pay $300 million up front and an additional $100 million if Playfish meets undisclosed financial targets.

Both Zynga and Playfish get most of their revenue from selling virtual goods and accessories—ranging from animated dogs to diamond tiaras—that users buy to increase their game-playing prowess or their online status. Gifts are also big. On Valentine's Day, Playfish sold 4 million virtual flowers for prices ranging from 5¢ to $2.

Buying the Farm

For example, a user who clicks on "Country Story" from the Playfish.com Web site gets a cartoon character avatar, some seeds, and a patch of green earth. An old dude with a gray beard pops onto the screen and offers advice on how to plow, plant, and water the garden. The user is soon harvesting his first virtual turnips.

That part of the game is free. But users often find themselves paying real money for virtual seeds, farm tools, and livestock as they build a lush online agricultural utopia with which to impress Facebook friends who are doing the same thing. The long-term question is whether such a business model has staying power. "What you need is the sheer number of people to make those micro-transactions work. It's sustainable if the numbers are maintained," says Paul Groves, who focuses on gaming for media law firm Harbottle & Lewis in London.

Competition is also growing, with an estimated 30,000 social networking games available. But Playfish co-founder Segerstrale, who earlier in his career helped found mobile-games company Macrospace—now a unit of San Mateo (Calif.)-based Glu Mobile (GLUU)—says that building a successful online game is not as easy as it looks. While the initial investment for an online game is lower than for a console game, online games require constant upgrading to keep users interested. "It's all about audience engagement," Segerstrale says. "You create a product, and you nurture it and you nurture it and nurture it."

The social gaming industry has suffered from bad publicity recently. Some game companies allowed players to earn virtual goods by accepting offers from advertisers. The strategy backfired after some of the offers proved to be dubious. Comolli said Playfish never used that tactic. "The advantage of social gaming is it brings in nontraditional gamers to play games," he said. "You can't exploit these people. That's not building a long-term business."

Ewing is BusinessWeek's European regional editor.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Crowdsourced cartography in PublicEarth, OpenStreetMap

The hype and momentum builds around crowd sourced maps. While crowd sourced maps will definitely help go 'hyper' local and aid with keeping data fresh by virtue of community participation, maintaining quality and integrity remain challenges


by Rafe Needleman, CNET News
November 16, 2009

Wikipedia killed the encyclopedia business, in print and online, as it's hard to make a revenue model work that involves paying people to create content when there are hordes of enthusiastic experts around the world willing to do the job for free. The business of mapping may be similarly doomed, as indicated by PublicEarth, a new wiki-style database of places launching Monday, and by the continued improvement in authoring tools at the crowdsourced mapping service OpenStreetMap.

PublicEarth

PublicEarth is an open database of places. Michael Rubin, who was an architect of Netflix, wanted to bring the same "element of delight" of connecting people to things they enjoy. Netflix did it for movies, and Public Earth is doing it for locations.

As with other crowdsourced place databases, anyone can insert a location. And as with most of the other products, PublicEarth uses Google base maps. The difference in PublicEarth is in the execution: It's slick, in a good way. For map users, PublicEarth lets you quickly find categories of locations -- romantic, kid-friendly, historic, for campers, etc. -- for places you are going. When you're looking at a map of places, you can get a lot of data by just rolling your mouse over hot spots, without clicking. "We learned how expensive a click is," Rubin says.


PublicEarth is a good system for a crowdsourced database of places.
(Credit: Screenshot by Rafe Needleman/CNET)

The system will have a recommendation engine that learns what you like. So if you've been using the system and then head to a new town you can just see the "recommended for you" locations.

The real value to PublicEarth is that it can find places that aren't, as they say, on the map. It's very easy for users to create a point of interest, draw a boundary line around a park, or trace a route to walk or hike. If enough people get into this system it could be a great resource for travelers. Which is the business model.

The PublicEarth team wants to make this service the go-to database of unusual places, and to partner with standard booking sites like Hotels.com, OpenTable, and travel solutions like TripIt. Getting traffic from those sites will get people into the system, and then sending booking and ticket traffic out to venues will generate revenue.

PublicEarth is also being marketed to activity groups like RV and sports clubs, parents groups, birdwatchers, and so on. It can be used by social networks to collect and collate locations aimed at specific interests, which can help people with those interests when they visit a new region.

Of course, success hinges on contributions, and it's not easy to create a user-maintained location database that sticks. There's also competition: Wikimapia and Yelp come to mind. But if PublicEarth can affiliate with other travel resources it could work out. It is a very strong product. It has the potential to compete with the guidebook market.

OpenStreetMap


PublicEarth is an open database of items on top of a map. OpenStreetMap is a crowdsourced map itself. The project was started before Google Maps came on to the scene, and while the search juggernaut's global road map is certainly more popular, there's a lot to be said for the OpenStreetMap approach. The fact that anyone with an interest in an area can create, correct, or update a map means you can get a lot of very specific data onto the map, created by people with very specific, nearly microscopic, knowledge of their regions.

And since the OpenStreetMap data itself is open, developers can do anything they wish with it. With a commercial map like Google's you have to push everything through one API, but with a truly open system you can create your own maps from the data, perform calculations on map points, and so. OpenStreetMap would be a great mapping database for the calculation engine Wolfram Alpha.


The MapZen iPhone app will help you map on the go.
(Credit: CloudMade)

Later this month a new map editor, MapZen, is coming to the system from CloudMade, a company that commercializes the OpenStreetMap project. MapZen will make it easier for mappers to create and correct roads and points of interest. An iPhone app, currently in approval limbo, will also make it easier for anyone to walk and map. And new social tools should be good for to help groups of "map buddies" coordinate their work.

The MapZen/OpenStreetMap combo also lets you do very specific and modern cartography. There's a junction editor, for example, that lets contributors specify turn restrictions by time of day.

CloudMade will monetize the system by offering search features and routing (with awareness of the junction turn restrictions), and possibly by working on location-based advertising.

OpenStreetMap currently matters more to people in less-mapped regions than to dwellers of hyper-mapped U.S. cities. But ultimately the system may enable new location-based apps and services thanks to its wide-open system.

The crowded map

Google has already added a form of crowdsourcing to its mapping services: Its traffic system gets location and speed data from its mobile users. (Users can get their own raw data through Latitude, if they wish.) But Google relies on its own private mapping data, and its own servers to deliver maps to users. It's an expensive model and it doesn't serve all users in all locations equally. The crowdsourced mapping model is a serious competitor to the proprietary map business. I wouldn't have thought it could work, but Wikipedia shows that it's a mistake to dismiss the power of millions of individuals, each willing to chip in a little bit, to create great reference works.

The full MapZen app lets you re-route roads. Please be careful.
(Credit: CloudMade)

Venture Capital firms invest $117-M in India during H1 2009


Venture Capital firms invested $117 million over 27 deals in India during the six months ending June 2009, according to a study by Venture Intelligence in partnership with the Global-India Venture Capital Association. While the uncertainty in global financial markets over the last six months has affected VC investing in India as well, VC industry experts indicate that there are clear signs of revival over the last couple of months.

Chennai, Tamil Nadu, July 21, 2009 /India PRwire/ -- Venture Capital firms invested $117 million over 27 deals in India during the six months ending June 2009, according to a study by Venture Intelligence (http://www.ventureintelligence.in) in partnership with the Global-India Venture Capital Association (http://www.givca.org). The amount invested during the period was lower compared to H1 2008 which had witnessed $413 million being invested across 67 deals.

“While the uncertainty in global financial markets over the last six months has affected VC investing in India as well, there are clear signs of revival over the last couple of months – especially in emerging markets like India,” said Sudhir Sethi, Director of GIVCA and Founder, Chairman & Managing Director of IDG Ventures India.

With 14 investments worth about $75 million, Information Technology and IT-Enabled Services (IT & ITES) companies accounted for about 52% of the deals (63% in value terms) during H1 2009. Within IT & ITES, Online Services companies retained their status as the favorite sector accounting for over 57% of the investments (by volume) within the industry during H1 2009.

Domestic demand driven sectors like Financial Services (especially microfinance), Healthcare and Education are the other industries that continue attract VC attention, the GIVCA/Venture Intelligence research shows. Early-Stage deals (First / Second Round of VC investments into companies that are less than five years old) accounted for two-thirds of the VC investments (and 57% in value terms) during H1 2009.

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

The Jugaad Country - Discovering India

Columnist Image

Jugaad Attitude Is Uniquely Indian.

Continuing with the theme of discovering India, I, time and time again, laugh through near death experiences, called the Indian roads. I laugh because crying is not an option. Every day in India reinforces two significant themes for me.

1) God does exist and,

2) Miracles do happen.

It’s through a combination of those two that the country continues to make progress in spite of the chaos and inefficiencies. I will try and summarize some of the key findings, typically during my travels, what I believe can only happen in India. Here is the one that I think really captures the essence of business and the enterprising spirit in India.

The concept called Jugaad. For many Indians, especially from the north, this is a commonly-used term. Jugaad is the summation of what makes India tick – enterprising, resourceful, and making things work to address what needs to be done within the constrained resources.

Many accuse Indians of taking the concept of Jugaad to the extreme and simply over-promising (it will be done) due perhaps to the firm belief that through Jugaad, someone will make “it” happen.

Recently, I happened to be in Roorkie for an Attero Board meeting. Due to logistics issues, this time my co-Board member and I decided to drive rather than take the train.

We also happened to have Michael Schumacher as the driver (Vijay Mallya, are you there? There is a Formula 1 driver in UP named Uttam looking to be discovered), which didn’t help. As we drove at 120 km/hour down a one lane but two-way road, both my fellow board member and I were more than a little nervous. When we asked the driver to slow down a bit, he responded simply by saying “sir, you will be late” and “just close your eyes”, as he turned the side mirror of the Innova inward to get about three more inches of space to pass the oncoming traffic.

After a while, we stopped at an intersection in Uttarakhand, and the experience was a bit surreal. The road was originally fairly wide, but due to encroachment by shopkeepers and residents, there wasn’t much room left for normal traffic. That’s also when the definition of “normal traffic” in the Indian context presented itself. At that intersection, we noticed eight different animals and about ten different modes of transportation sharing that one lane.

What really grabbed my attention was a brand new vehicle that I had never seen before. Upon further investigation I was told the vehicle itself is called “Jugaad”. The vehicle was a stretch auto-rickshaw running on what looked like a lawnmower engine (actually it’s a water pump set converted into an engine), but capable of carrying about 50 people and with a typical travel speed of 10-15 km/hour. It’s not a creation of Ratan Tata, Anand Mahindra or Suzuki. It has no licence plate and is definitely not registered with the RTO.

But Jugaad is a home (backyard) built people mover using the bare necessary parts but serving a real need (how else do you get lots of people transported especially where local public transportation doesn’t exist). Interestingly enough, this same vehicle had two mirrors sticking up from its hood – one facing backward for obvious reasons and one facing forward, for a not so obvious reason. The vehicle has no headlights, so it uses the front facing mirror as a reflective surface to use the oncoming traffic’s high beam to create its own de facto headlight (this is the premium version of Jugaad). The vehicle doesn’t have any sort of certification or have impressive performance specs, but it does the job of hauling lots of people fairly reliably from point A to point B. And that folks is the definition of jugaad, which means “it may not look pretty, but you use innovation and the resources you have to get the job done”.

Let me give yet another terrifying example a few years earlier that also typifies Jugaad in India. In 2005, I came to India for my brother- in-law’s wedding. It was a hectic trip (at that time, my three kids were 5, 2, and 3 months old) and there was one especially late night when we found ourselves in the midst of a very uniquely Indian experience. It was around 1 am. There were 11 of us travelling by Qualis (imagine 5 kids under the age of 6, my wife, my sister- in-law and my in-laws).

I was sleeping in the front seat with my 2-year-old on my lap with the seat belt on when suddenly the car came to a screeching halt. I woke up only to find that the car engine was on fire. Panicked, I opened the door and started taking the kids out. The kids were crying, the mothers were screaming and crying simultaneously. My in-laws with two six-year-old kids were in the back seats of the Qualis. The trunk was locked so I had to get the driver to open the trunk first and then try and douse the flames. With all the commotion, a couple of good Samaritans pulled over to try and help.

A truck pulled up next to us that had a fire extinguisher and helped put the fire out; the fire department showed up within 2-3 minutes as did police. I was absolutely amazed by that. In the US, it would have taken longer for emergency services to reach the scene. I was told later that this was near Safdurjung Hospital and that there was a fire engine on duty there. It also helped that it was the middle of the night with little traffic. Regardless, the response was pleasantly surprising. It was late and freezing (December time in Delhi) and no way for us to get to Faridabad (about 50 km away) which was our eventual destination. After about 10 minutes, our driver simply came over to me and said, “aao baitho (come sit)”. I looked at him in disbelief. To us, it was traumatic; to him, it was routine. There was no way that I was going to put my family at risk heading to Faridabad in a burnt up Qualis.

We arranged for a taxi, and the Qualis simply followed us back to Faridabad, with burnt out headlights and charred bonnet. We got back to Faridabad around 2:30 am. The next morning, to our complete astonishment, the driver was at our doorstep at 9 am indicating the Qualis was completely fixed and as good as new. We all ran outside and sure enough, it was humming without any sign that it was actually on fire 7-8 hours earlier. There was a short circuit in the headlights that had caused the fire. The driver had contacted a mechanic who worked through the night, replaced the headlights, the charred metal parts, bonnet cover and the cabling/wiring using some authentic but mostly make-shift parts.

Although hesitant, we decided we would give the Qualis a shot. We continued to use that same Qualis through Delhi and Punjab over the next several days without incident. That’s when I first heard the term “jugaad”. As I sat in the Qualis that morning after the incident, I thought to myself…what would have happened in a similar circumstance in the US. My guess is that after the police reports, and insurance paperwork, it would have taken at least 2-3 weeks to get the car fixed and usable. Perhaps that’s the difference between a so-called developing and developed country. In a developing country, one simply “does” because “not doing it or waiting” is simply not an option. That’s probably why the “ho jaiga (it will be done)” attitude is so prevalent in India, because one knows that whatever the issue, one will figure out a way to address it, although the exact mechanism and timeline may be very unorthodox and unpredictable.

So, whether it’s Jugaad the vehicle, or the mindset and enterprising nature that one calls Jugaad, it is something that is uniquely Indian and one that we should cherish rather than blame, which is often the case.

Samsung Sees Open Water With 'Bada'

Another OS and this time with Samsung peddling it


November 16, 2009 | Dan Jones |





The field of "open" mobile operating systems is going to get even more crowded in 2010.

Giant South Korean phone vendor Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. is prepping its own "Bada" open operating system for launch this December. Bada (Korean for "ocean") will join Google (Nasdaq: GOOG)'s Android, the LiMo Foundation 's mobile Linux code, and the Symbian Foundation 's newly open code-base, all of which can be tweaked by third-party developers.

In-Stat says that the launch reflects the prevailing trend in the cellphone market: The focus has shifted from hardware to software and providing a flexible environment for developing and porting applications.

The Symbian operating system is still the dominant player in the mobile operating system market. Canalys.com Ltd. recently found that Symbian had 46.2 percent share of the overall smartphone OS market in the third quarter of 2009. (See Android's Steep Climb.)

In-Stat believes that new open entrants could start to reduce Symbian's market share.

"The momentum of alternative OSs is unmistakable and will continue to cut away at Symbian’s market share," says In-Stat VP of mobile research Frank Dickson in a note on Bada. "While it is difficult to forecast the future of new entrants like Bada, the market might of Samsung will give Bada life."

Dickson, however, believes that Android, not Bada, will be the big open OS news next year: "In the short term, Android seems to have the strong momentum. 2010 will be the year of Android."

The War For the Web


Its becoming clear to me that we are heading into a bloody period of competition that could be extremely unfriendly to the interoperable web as we know it today.


by Tim O'Reilly

On Friday, my latest tweet was automatically posted to my Facebook news feed, as always. But this time, Tom Scoville noticed a difference: the link in the posting was no longer active.

It turns out that a lot of other people had noticed this too. Mashable wrote about the problem on Saturday morning: Facebook Unlinks Your Twitter Links.

if you’re posting web links (Bit.ly, TinyURL) to your Twitter feed and using the Twitter Facebook app to share those updates on Facebook too, none of those links are hyperlinked. Your friends will need to copy and paste the links into a browser to make them work.

If this is a design decision on Facebook’s part, it’s an extremely odd one: we’d like to think it’s an inconvenient bug, and we have a mail in to Facebook to check. Suffice to say, the issue is site-wide: it’s not just you.

As it turns out, it wasn't just links imported from Twitter. All outbound links were temporarily disabled, unless users explicitly added them as links via an "attach" dialogue. I went to Facebook, and tried posting a link to this blog directly in my status feed, and saw the same behavior: links were no longer automatically made clickable. You can see that in the image that is the destination of the first link in this piece.

The problem was quickly fixed, with URLs in status updates automatically now linkified again. The consensus was that it was in fact a bug, but it's little surprise that people suspected otherwise, given the increasing amount of effort Facebook puts into warning people that they are leaving Facebook for the big bad unsafe Internet:

BeCareful.png VisibleEveryone.png







All of this is well-intentioned, I'm sure. After all, Facebook is attempting to put in place privacy controls that allow its users to manage the visibility of their information -- and the Web's expectation of universal visibility is not necessarily the best default for much of the information posted on Facebook. But let's not kid ourselves: Facebook is a new kind of web site (or an old kind redux), a world of its own, playing by different rules.

But this isn't just about Facebook.

The Apple iPhone is the hottest web access device around, and like Facebook, while it connects to the web, it plays by a different set of rules. Anyone can put up a website, or launch a new Windows or Mac OS X or Linux application, without anyone's permission. But put an app onto the iPhone? That requires Apple's blessing.

There is one glaring loophole: anyone can create a web application, which any user can save as clickable application on their phone. But these web applications have limits - there are key capabilities of the phone that are not accessible to web applications. HTML 5 can introduce all the new application-like features it wants, but they will work only for web applications, and can't access key aspects of the phone without Apple's permission. And as we saw earlier this year with Apple's rejection of the Google Voice application, Apple isn't shy about blocking applications that it considers threatening to their core business, or that of their partners.

And now, of course, we see the latest salvo in the war against the accepted rules of interoperability on the web: Rupert Murdoch's threat to take the Wall Street Journal out of the Google search index. While most people have repeated the existing wisdom that to do so would be suicide for the Journal, a few contrarian observers have noted the leverage Murdoch holds. Mark Cuban argues that Twitter now trumps search engines when it comes to breaking news. Even more provocatively, Jason Calacanis suggested, a few weeks before Murdoch's announcement, that all big media companies need to do to cut Google off at the knees would be to block Google, while cutting an exclusive deal with Bing to be found only in Microsoft's search index.

Of course, Google wouldn't take that lying down, and would likely make its own exclusive deals, leading to a showdown that would make the browser wars of the 90s seem tame.

I'm not saying that News Corp and other mainstream media publications would adopt Jason's suggested strategy, or that it would work if they did, but it is becoming clear to me that we are heading into a bloody period of competition that could be extremely unfriendly to the interoperable web as we know it today.

If you've followed my thinking about Web 2.0 from the beginning, you know that I believe we are engaged in a long term project to build an internet operating system. (Check out the program for the first O'Reilly Emerging Technology Conference in 2002 (pdf).) In my talks over the years, I've argued that there are two models of operating system, which I have characterized as "One Ring to Rule Them All" and "Small Pieces Loosely Joined," with the latter represented by a routing map of the Internet.

OneRingLooselyJoined.png

The first is the winner-takes-all world that we saw with Microsoft Windows on the PC, a world that promises simplicity and ease of use, but ends up diminishing user and developer choice as the operating system provider.

The second is an operating system that works like the Internet itself, like the web, and like open source operating systems like Linux: a world that is admittedly less polished, less controlled, but one that is profoundly generative of new innovations because anyone can bring new ideas to the market without having to ask permission of anyone.

I've outlined a few of the ways that big players like Facebook, Apple, and News Corp are potentially breaking the "small pieces loosely joined" model of the Internet. But perhaps most threatening of all are the natural monopolies created by Web 2.0 network effects.

One of the points I've made repeatedly about Web 2.0 is that it is the design of systems that get better the more people use them, and that over time, such systems have a natural tendency towards monopoly.

And so we've grown used to a world with one dominant search engine, one dominant online encyclopedia, one dominant online retailer, one dominant auction site, one dominant online classified site, and we've been readying ourselves for one dominant social network.

But what happens when a company with one of these natural monopolies uses it to gain dominance in other, adjacent areas? I've been watching with a mixture of admiration and alarm as Google has taken their dominance in search and used it to take control of other, adjacent data-driven applications. I noted this first with speech recognition, but it's had the biggest business impact so far in location-based services.

A few weeks ago, Google offered free turn-by-turn directions for Android phones. This is awesome news for consumers, who previously could get this only in dedicated GPS devices or with high-priced iPhone apps. But it's also a sign just how competitive the web is getting, and just how powerful Google is getting, because they understand that "data is the Intel Inside" of the next generation of computer applications.

Nokia paid $8 billion for NavTeq, the leading provider of such turn-by-turn directions. GPS-maker TomTom paid $3.7 billion for TeleAtlas, the #2 provider in the market. Google quietly built an equivalent service, and is now giving it away for free -- but only to their own business partners. Everyone else still has to pay high fees to NavTeq and TeleAtlas. What's more, Google upped the ante by adding in such features as Street View.

Most interestingly, this move sets the stage for the future competition between Google and Apple. Apple controls access to the dominant device of the mobile web; Google controls access to one of the most important mobile applications, and so far, is making it available for free only on Android. Google's prowess is not just in search, but in mapping, speech recognition, automated translation, and other applications driven by huge, intelligent databases that only a few providers can offer. Microsoft and Nokia control comparable assets, but they too are Apple competitors, and unlike Google, their business model depends on selling access to those assets, not giving them away for free.

It could be that everyone will figure out how to play nicely with each other, and we'll see a continuation of the interoperable web model we've enjoyed for the past two decades. But I'm betting that things are going to get ugly. We're heading into a war for control of the web. And in the end, it's more than that, it's a war against the web as an interoperable platform. Instead, we're facing the prospect of Facebook as the platform, Apple as the platform, Google as the platform, Amazon as the platform, where big companies slug it out until one is king of the hill.

And it's time for developers to take a stand. If you don't want a repeat of the PC era, place your bets now on open systems. Don't wait till it's too late.

P.S. One prediction: Microsoft will emerge as a champion of the open web platform, supporting interoperable web services from many independent players, much as IBM emerged as the leading enterprise backer of Linux.

I'll be speaking on this topic in my keynote at the Web 2.0 Expo in New York on Tuesday. I'll look forward to seeing many of you there.

Sunday, November 15, 2009

Searching for the next big

There is more to mobile search than just browsing. In mobile devices there is an increased need for accuracy, relevancy and contextual results. This is not to say that PC users do not require the same, but on a PC it is much easier to create an advanced search query that improves the probability of getting the right answer. The need for a simple and easy user interface and user-friendly results is amplified in a mobile device. Search engines for mobile devices should return only a handful of results with a high accuracy, focused on answers and not lists of links. This change of focus requires semantic search engines that ‘understand’ the meaning of words and content, rather than merely matching keywords. These have been in development for a while and are emerging for internet search but have failed to achieve widespread adoption so far.

Telecom.com, November 14, 2009
Searching for the next big thing

The adoption of mobile phones to access information and digital content on the web is growing fast, but the mobile search user experience still leaves much to be desired. If mobile search doesn’t see dramatic improvement, it will hinder device sales and delay the advent of what could become a huge market for mobile advertising. Mobile search should be easy and give results focused on answers, not links.

There is little ‘joy of use’ in the mobile search user experience

The use of mobile phones to access the internet for content and to search for information is increasing. Global internet information provider ComScore reported that the number of people using mobile devices to access news and information on the internet more than doubled in 2008. Furthermore, among the 63.2 million people who accessed news and information on their mobile devices in January 2009, 22.4 million (35%) did so daily – more than double the size of the audience last year.

With a growing appetite for mobile content, consumers and business users will be looking to mobile search for information or content access and retrieval. Given the rapid evolution of mobile devices and networks in recent years, they would be justified in thinking that mobile search would provide slick interfaces and accurate results. But in most cases they would be disappointed. While search on the internet has revolutionised how we access information, the same is not true of mobile search. This is still in its infancy, and the typical user experience leaves much to be desired. With falling prices for connections and data plans, a better mobile search user experience could vastly increase adoption of the technology and further boost demand for web-enabled mobile phones. It would also stimulate growth of a potentially vast market for mobile advertising, parallel to the one that has developed around PC-based internet search.

People interact differently with their mobiles than with their PCs

Search on mobile phones started and remains as functionality that was designed for PCs reconfigured for the small mobile screen. Typically the search query returns a long list of results with links that the mobile phone user then has to sift through using nothing other than the phone’s tiny screen and keypad. The user experience does not necessarily get any better when the user clicks on one of those links; indeed the majority of websites are designed purely for PC-based browsing and are nearly indecipherable on a mobile screen. Vendors and content providers have to recognise that people interact with their mobile phones in very different ways than they do their PCs. The interaction is dictated by the tiny screen, typically awkward keypad and limited on-screen navigation. Given these constraints, navigating a long list of search results is hardly user-friendly. It is important to note the success of Apple iPhone and its Safari web browser in particular, as they have gone a long way to address these issues. According to Google, iPhone users will perform on average 50 times more searches than users of other web-enabled mobile phones. There are clearly lessons to be learnt from Apple on usability.

Microsoft is set to up the competitive ante in this market with its next Windows Mobile release. Windows Mobile 6.5 is expected to provide a better mobile browsing experience based on Internet Explorer 6, but with improved security, a JavaScript engine from Internet Explorer 8, better graphics rendering and the capability to play Flash content.

Mobile search should deliver answers, not links

There is more to mobile search than just browsing. In mobile devices there is an increased need for accuracy, relevancy and contextual results. This is not to say that PC users do not require the same, but on a PC it is much easier to create an advanced search query that improves the probability of getting the right answer. The need for a simple and easy user interface and user-friendly results is amplified in a mobile device. Search engines for mobile devices should return only a handful of results with a high accuracy, focused on answers and not lists of links. This change of focus requires semantic search engines that ‘understand’ the meaning of words and content, rather than merely matching keywords. These have been in development for a while and are emerging for internet search but have failed to achieve widespread adoption so far.

Microsoft’s Bing and Yahoo partnership could have a large impact

Microsoft’s new Internet search engine, Bing, includes technologies gained from the Fast and Powerset acquisitions. While Fast was a leader in enterprise searches, Powerset gave Microsoft a semantic search engine that tries to understand the meaning of web pages using technology licensed from Xerox’s PARC subsidiary. In time, this could lead to the answers-oriented processing that in our view best fits mobile search requirements.

Another recent development is the ten-year Yahoo and Microsoft agreement that from 2010 will see Microsoft’s Bing powering Yahoo Search and Yahoo becoming the exclusive global sales force for both organisations’ premium search advertising. Disappointingly, at the time of the announcement not much was said about mobile search except that Yahoo has the option to exploit Microsoft technology for its mobile search capability. Ovum believes that mobile search represents a significant opportunity for both companies. With a market of potentially billions of users, it is important that Microsoft and Yahoo combine their respective strengths to provide a mobile search capability focused on the requirements of the user on the move.

Websites ignore mobile search at their peril

In addition to better search capabilities on the device, it’s also important that individual websites provide better mobile search support. Failure to do so will have several consequences, including incomplete results for the searcher, inaccurate ranking of search results and fewer hits for the website sponsor. Already, mobile search tools such as Taptu only list sites that are optimised for mobile viewing. As more people switch to mobiles for web access, site sponsors will see their hits decline unless they provide better mobile support.

The future of mobile search: voice, location and personalization

Voice-activated mobile search is emerging – not as a replacement for the keypad or touchscreen, but as an alternative to them. Its success in car GPS systems suggests that voice would be a valuable enhancement to search capabilities generally. Unlike PCs and laptops, mobile phones are location-enabled and therefore can support the expansion of mobile search functionality into this area. As more consumers buy mobile devices that are intended to be more than phones, and as advanced networks are built out to support them, growth in location-based services and search is expected to take off.

Personalisation in mobile search would add much value to the user experience. Mobile search users tend to have distinct consumer and business requirements such as hobbies and business interests. While as a consumer a user might search for a particular piece or style of music, as a business user they might perform regular searches on specific companies or financial indices. Smart or personalised search capabilities, offered alone or together, would do much to enhance the user’s experience.

Google and Yahoo are leading players in mobile search

Google and Yahoo already offer location-tailored results. Given their internet search presence, it is not surprising that they are two of the leading players in the mobile search market – helped by alliances with mobile service providers that place them as preferred search solutions on web-enabled handsets. Their solutions are optimised for mobile and, to facilitate speed of delivery, URL and search suggestions appear as you type. Another vendor, Apple, provides a good example of how successful location-based search applications can be – there are many offerings within Apple’s App Store that use the handset’s location to provide details of local facilities (as restaurants) and other tailored information.

The giants of PC-based search will be difficult to topple. Small technology companies will continue to create niche mobile search applications, brand recognition and deep research & development pockets make existing market leaders obvious favourites the race for mobile search queries and, ultimately, the associated advertising revenues.

Sarah Burnett and Mark Blowers are senior analysts with Ovum